New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12862 previous messages)

rshow55 - 03:18pm Jul 6, 2003 EST (# 12863 of 12865)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

A Final Push for the Bedeviled, Beloved Osprey By LESLIE WAYNE http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/06/business/06CHOP.html is an excellent article, referring to an aircraft that has had many problems ( Cheney tried to kill the program as Secretary of Defense ) where justification of deployment is a close call - depending on technical details - and also some very tough tactical and strategic judgements.

If the United States needs this capability - at this price - ( more than 12 billion has been spent - and 458 Ospreys will cost 48 billion ) then that is a very strong argument that we ought to be working hard to reduce our national dependence on oil.

On this thread, there's been a lot of discussion of Osprey - and sometimes I've even thought it might have been influential discussion. It started with my commented on statements of General James L. Jones - then Commandant of the Marine Corps, now commander of NATO.

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md978_981.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md982_984.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md985_986.htm

Gen. James L. Jones "disputed the claim of some critics that he and his service have become so enamored of the Osprey that they are blind to its vulnerabilities.

- ``I would resist with all my moral fiber the idea that we would willingly or knowingly try to bring aboard a program -- the V-22 or anything else -- that we've so fallen in love with that we would put people at risk,'' he said. ``We just simply wouldn't do that, and I don't think we've done that.''

- If the Osprey is deemed unsafe, ``I will guarantee you that I will have no reservations whatsoever in recommending a different course''

I expressed concerns. I also wrote General Jones, c/o a Marine Corps web site, sent him a copy of a Kipling poem Soldier an' Sailor Too http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee79f4e/1702 and said why I was doing it:

In the NYT Missile Defense thread, I criticised a US Marine, a man I very much respect who is head of a military force I very much respect. I'm putting a poem I like, about Marines ..

( I like many of Kipling's poems : http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.xw71bnLZnbm.640072@.f28e622/3983

rshow55 - 03:22pm Jul 6, 2003 EST (# 12864 of 12865)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Other links referring to Osprey:

2368 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2367.htm

The Osprey program, alone, exceeds Russia's current indebtedness. 12 billion dollars have been spent to build 8 airplanes that cannot, as of now, be flown.

. . . To make peace, people have to find common ground about what happened in the past -- they have to be "reading off the same page" - not feeling the same way about the facts, perhaps, but knowing the same facts.

And, all over the world, in case after case, where there have been hostilites, or threats of them, there have been many, many deceptions, lies, and evasions, going on a long time - _ almost always, on all sides -- and people seem unable to face up to that plain fact.

2405 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2405.htm

2411 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2411.htm

Exemplary cases of how social groups actually function, small enough to study, large enough to contain all the major difficulties of socio-technical function, ought to be studied.

2587 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2587.htm

2631 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2629.htm

3507 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md2000s/md2739.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md3000s/md3505.htm

3584 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md3000s/md3583.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5077.htm

5835 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5828.htm

6582-3 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md6000s/md6577.htm

6586 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md6000s/md6586.htm

7013 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7012.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7036.htm

7232 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7232.htm

7236 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7236.htm

7450 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md7000s/md7449.htm

"Mystro a drum roll for these big-ticket items in procurement for the military industrial complex: "

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense