New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11884 previous messages)

rshow55 - 12:02pm May 23, 2003 EST (# 11885 of 11903)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

In my view, the government owes my investors about 40 million bucks. That's one issue. Not that I can solve that one - who says life is fair?

But the idea that "I gave up" is crazy - and the stakes are high enough that I'll keep going, yet a while.

I also think that, though I may not be important or worthy - the problems I've worked on are important. Getting the record straight is important to me - and I think to the whole world - and bit by bit that is happening.

I need my security situation clarified enough so that I can legally try to do things.

11737 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.bIkVbn4FaLJ.1624335@.f28e622/13347

"I would like to be able to set up something very much like AEA again - and do it honestly - and work with Lchic in that format.

"I'd like to be able to do that with people involved in AEA fully informed, and satisfied to the extent that was reasonably possible.

"In ways that were reasonably satisfactory to my wife, her husband, the New York Times, other members of families involved, the federal government, and other people more-or-less connected. In ways that most people at the UN, if they happened to notice, might think fair.

"I think, under the circumstances, that it might be particularly good if I could proceed on a basis senior people at Deutsche Bank Securities would think honorable, workable, and fair.

Note: Germany, Russia, and many other countries care very much about issues of planning that Eisenhower cared about - that are now "not to be considered" in the US government.

"I've been trying to "play it straight" for a very long time.

http://www.mrshowalter.net/ScienceInTheNewsJan4_2000.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/ToE_H_E_G_P_M_xd.html

http://www.mrshowalter.net/Safire_SpookAwardsNRequestXd.html

http://www.mrshowalter.net/etterToDeutscheBankSecuritiesXd.html

Bragg contact http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@192.DbxgaORTUHW^1265093@.f28e622/5785

http://www.mrshowalter.net/Burke_Jun16.htm

"If the requests involved were awkward, the circumstances were awkward, too.

I think, considering everything, I've been both honorable and diligent. The idea that I didn't work hard enough is crazy.

11744 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.bIkVbn4FaLJ.1624335@.f28e622/13354 Right now - as a practical matter I'm under restrictions -

If I was free of security limitations - or had clear limitations, and that was in writing, or otherwise clearly checkable then I could interact with people in workable ways - for collaborations and business relationships that fit real needs, in real circumstances.

The nation owes me that.

lchic - 04:28pm May 23, 2003 EST (# 11886 of 11903)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

NYT BLAIR

Blair is verbally thumbing his nose at the NYT & Staff

... as a $sixfigure book is considered.

It seems illogical that a liar-taking money under false pretences should hit gold!

lchic - 05:03pm May 23, 2003 EST (# 11887 of 11903)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Steering in truth --- Ford 185000 - recall

lchic - 05:24pm May 23, 2003 EST (# 11888 of 11903)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Fiction: No results found for: bbbuck

- You have been browsed 'and found wanting'!

lchic - 05:28pm May 23, 2003 EST (# 11889 of 11903)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Audio snippet - John Grey - author

This guy has written a book that looks at terrorism - a point he makes is the failure of Islamic scholars to say anything ... to even speak .... he says the terrorist mvt is more ideological than pyramid-based-binLaden ...

----

More Messages Recent Messages (14 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense