View Mail   Help

Previous | Next | Sent 
     
Show Full HeadersAdd Sender To Address Book
 
From:  m. Robert Showalter <mrshowalter@thedawn.com>
Reply-To:  mrshowalter@thedawn.com
To:   Email adresses in original - deleted here
Subject:  Disk, and contact.
Date:  Wed, 24 July 2002 07:55:41 -0700
Attachments
NameTypeSaveView
Part 1  text/plainSave 
Burke_Jun16.htm  text/htmlSave 
3155_on_Disk.htm  text/htmlSave 
3158_onDisk.htm  text/htmlSave 
Kind associates and friends:

I've sent you copies of a disk archiving and organizing the NYT Missile 
Defense thread.      The index page, and some comments about it are 
enclosed with this email, and are set out in MD3155 
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@104.Nyu9aiNUPXe^0@.f28e622/3936

For some time, especially since September 2000,  I've been trying to 
resolve an awkward situation.   Recently, I've been discussing the 
matter with Captain Dale Burke, who heads the UW Police - who became 
involved and who has been helpful.    I enclose a text I gave Captain 
Burke in a meeting we had last week.

It includes this:

"If I was free of security limitations - or had clear limitations, and 
that was in writing, or otherwise clearly checkable then I could 
interact with people in workable ways - for collaborations and business 
relationships that fit real needs, in real circumstances.

"I need workable answers to both the following questions:
". . . How can I pay you enough?
"...... How can I thank you enough?
"for both, I need workable credentialing. Credentialing that may be 
limited, but that does not confront "people with unacceptable conflicts 
and risks.

I don't think I'm asking for unreasonable things -- and I think 
resolving this situation is not only in my personal interest, but in 
other interests as well.  

It seems to me that if the government showed the good sense and good 
faith Captain Burke has shown, and that people at UW I suspect he's 
worked with have shown - my problems could have been resolved, at least 
well enough to permit me to work, long ago.

A key problem I have is to get a relationship between me and the CIA, 
that is "resolved" on an unusable "verbal" basis, resolved in a basis I 
can actually use for action.   Here are references related to that:

2565 
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@167.OSEWaKCrMth^1891461@.f28e622/3198
2574 
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@167.OSEWaKCrMth^1891516@.f28e622/3212
 to
2589 
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@167.OSEWaKCrMth^1891576@.f28e622/3227
and especially 2590 
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?14@167.OSEWaKCrMth^1891576@.f28e622/3228


I'm sending this message to 
......Stephen Hawk, of Northern Capital Management (831-8018);
..... John Petersen III - who heads the Wisconsin Investment board and 
was a major AEA investor (255-4074);
..... Edward Gisske, PE, who has known me for many years (608-608-523-1900);
..... Professor Miles Epstein, of the UW Department of Anatomy;
..... Daniel Eimermann, MD - who has treated me for a long time (238-7675);
......and Captain Dale Burke (262-4981)
All of you know a good deal about my situation, and I've appreciated my 
chances to talk to you.   Eimermann has also talked to a representative 
of CIA, a woman identified to me as XXXXXX XXXXXXX.     Any of you have 
my permission to talk to anyone you feel you reasonably should, about 
anything you know about me, according to what you think is right.   
Certainly, I'd be glad if any of you wanted to call or contact me  -- or
 each other. 

I can be reached by phone at 829-3657  - by email at 
mrshowatler@thedawn.com  -- and by mail at 7205B Old Sauk Rd, Madison, 
Wisconsin .   I find it an honor and a pleasure to hear the voices of 
any one of you.

I need workable answers to both the following questions, dealing with 
you, and with other people:
. . . How can I pay you enough?
...... How can I thank you enough?

I don't have good answers to these questions, but I'm working on them.
   I'm trying to get the "story" I've been telling checked.   So that I 
can have workable enough "credentials" to live, work, and contribute.   
I'm hoping that the Missile Defense Archive disk - as it develops, will 
be part of that.

Thank you,

Bob 

M. Robert Showalter


Adults need secrets, lies and fictions

To live within their contradictions



But when things go wrong

And knock about



Folks get together

And work it out



. . . . . Suggestion for a nursery rhyme.







If I was free of security limitations - or had clear limitations, and that was in writing, or otherwise clearly checkable then I could interact with people in workable ways - for collaborations and business relationships that fit real needs, in real circumstances.



I need workable answers to both the following questions:



. . . How can I pay you enough?



...... How can I thank you enough?



for both, I need workable credentialing. Credentialing that may be limited, but

that does not confront people with unacceptable conflicts and risks.





Example: The Missile Defense Archive CD disk - as "sample and credentials."



Could I give it



to foundations,

to professional associates,

to the Wisconsin delegation,

to University professors and professionals

- - and refer to things in it safely?







Contacts within the University:



If I need chaperoning, can I hire a police escort, for the limited contacts I'd actually need with some key people?



Sharon Dunwoody

Gary Price

Mimi Bloch

Robin Chapman



and WARF

Can I tell what I regard to be the truth (subject to the usual risks regarding good faith and fraud) to U.W. neuroscientists so that we might have workable collaborations? Without fictions (or without unsustainable fictions that do harm.) I can't impersonate a conventionally trained Ph.D. neuroscientist or mathematician. I know I'd need funding - but if I can tell the truth, I think I can raise it.





Operational Fact:

If I can't get debriefed by the government - I have strong reasons to try to get foundation funding so that I can be debriefed on a private basis. Work on NYT forums - especially the Missile Defense forum -- offers a coordinated and extensive body of checkable points.



I want to get the AEA investors paid as they should be, and back pay for myself if that can be arranged. I feel justified in pursuing this.



I think my needs can be served well, meeting the needs of others as well.



Priority ordering for me: National interest . . . NYT interest . .

scientific community interest . . . U.W. interest . . . my own

interest. I come last in priority, but I matter, too.



Sometimes, for all sorts of reasons, a person has to be able to communicate with other people.


New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3154 previous messages)

rshowalt - 09:16am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3155 of 3252) Delete Message

Formatting's not right -- but with Mark Heuman's wonderful help I'm working to "publish" a CD that archives this thread, from the beginning, with some collected searches and comment. Eventually with a search facility, and other things useful for "connecting the dots." Here, not exactly as it appears, but with the content, is the index page, as now:

M. Robert Showalter: Missile Defense Archive

Calendar of NYTimes Missile Defense Discussion

Auxiliary and Summary Files


(more)

rshowalt - 09:19am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3156 of 3252) Delete Message

Most of the material here is copyrighted. Copyright holders include

The New York Times
Guardian Newspapers
ABC [American Broadcasting Company]
ACS [Australian Computer Society]
Acronym Institute
Al-Tawhid
American Institute of Physics
Asia Times
Australian Broadcasting Company
BBC
Brookings Institution
Captive Daughters
ChinaOnline
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Center for Defense Information
Common Dreams
CXO Media Inc.
Council on Foreign Relations
The Crafts Center
Cato Institute
Citizens for Legitimate Government
Coldfeet Press
Dawn [Pakistan] Group of Newspapers
The Economist
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
FAS
Financial Times group
Global Psychics Inc.
Google The Independent
International Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic
International Crisis Group
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War
King & Spalding
Los Angeles Times
The Mercury
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Moscow Times
MSNBC
National Cable Satellite Corporation
The New Criterion
News Limited
Online Journal
OSCE
Oxygen Media
PBS
Pravda
Reed Business Information
Rockford Institute
Sandhills Publishing Company
Space.com inc.
St. Petersburg Times
Telegraph Group Limited
Terrorism Research Center
Time Inc.
Times [London] Newspapers
The Trustees of Indiana University
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Washington Post
The Weekend Australian
YugoslaviaInfo airbornelaser.com
chinadaily.com.cn
democratic-alliance.com
earthside.com
GlobalSecurity.org
holocaustrevealed.org
mohr.hr
NationalSecurity.org
SMH.com.au
spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk
webdesk.com
theworldnews.com.au
worldpolicy.org
WorldTribune.com
Adriana Bebiano
Kai-Uwe Carstensen
Burnley A. ("Rocky") Jones
Mike Malloy
Dmitrii Manin
Kharlena Ramanan
Kim Rollins
Ann Rosenthal
Sherman H. Skolnick
Erik Trinkaus
Paul Walker
Timothy James Warnock
Lynn Maupin Webb

Date this disk was published: 17 July 2002


rshowalt - 09:24am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3157 of 3252) Delete Message

I'll try to get into contact with the copyright holders with significant stakes -- and try to work something out that makes sense -- giving them free use of the disk editions that use their material -- promising not to use the disk for commercial purposes without notifying them - - and perhaps some other things. I believe that this can be done in a way that is fair to all concerned, and that sets good precedents, rather than bad ones.

I'd be proud for the chance to get a copy of this archive disk into the hands of all major politicians in America (and some in Europe and Asia) if I could. That won't be possible. But some things might be.

I think the disk will be useful in a number of ways.

One way is in discussion of "collecting, connecting and correcting of dots".

More Messages Recent Messages (95 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3157 previous messages)

rshowalt - 10:34am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3158 of 3252) Delete Message

There are a lot of reasons for me to want this material considered, and some are "ulterior motives" that I'm not ashamed of, and that go a long way, I believe, toward setting aside the argument that I'm being irrational doing the work I've done associated with this forum.

MD2770 rshow55 6/29/02 7:59am

MD2981-2986 000 especially MD2986 rshow55 7/10/02 3:58pm

I've been keeping promises I made to Bill Casey - promises I've wanted to keep for many reasons, with "mixed motivations" in many of the usual senses.

One motive is personal, and I feel it strongly.

I'm taking a chance to advance the culture, and think, with lchic's brilliant collaboration, I'm (we're) making some headway.

The idea of "connecting the dots" associates with a lot that is very practical, at a number of levels - including some other "old" ideas that can be made more useful with a little additional focusing. The ideas of "disciplined beauty" - "the golden rule" . . . and the idea that, when it matters enough, there is a moral obligation to tell the truth in the ways that matter for action.

lchic - 10:40am Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3159 of 3252)

Some are driven
Others chauffered
None want the world to 'end'

http://static.ifilm.com/image/stills/films/a/105004_m_1_a_.jpg
http://www.whoohoo.net/power/
zulphia 7/18/02 5:26pm

rshowalt - 12:07pm Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3160 of 3252) Delete Message

The world could easily end, and it seems to me to be almost a wonder it hasn't already (in 1962, and at some other times, as well - for instance, the time described in this sermon http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/sermon.html ).

But if we figured out just a little bit more than we know, and if we were just a little bit more honest -- we could survive - and the world would be much better. If the following simple rhyme became a "nursery rhyme" - learned by 4 year olds and their parents -- the world would become a lot better. The rhyme has a lot to do with "connecting the dots" - and the fact that people, good as they are, aren't perfect.

Adults need secrets, lies and fictions
To live within their contradictions.

. . . . But when things go wrong
. . . . And knock about

. . . . Folks get together
. . . . And work it out.

. . . .

I've done a little searching, and I'm working to do a little summarizing. . . . back in less than an hour.

rshowalt - 01:03pm Jul 19, 2002 EST (#3161 of 3252) Delete Message

While I'm summarizing, I'd like to point out that there's been a great deal of discussion, some in my view well thought out and well written, about the idea of "connecting the dots." There were similar ideas on this thread (and a lot of other places) - but I was impressed with the phrase "connect the dots" used by Erica Goode. MD324 contains this:

Facts and ideas, combined together in space and time so that people can "connect the dots" , as Erica Goode says in Finding Answers In Secret Plots http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/10/weekinreview/10GOOD.html form the ideas that people and groups have. -- These ideas are patterns, which work well enough to sustain action and belief in some ways, though they may be totally invalid otherwise. These ideas, constructed by "connecting the dots" may produce grossly pathological results -- fueling hatred, wars, and cycles of poverty. Or they may be correct.

To judge that, one checks the "facts" "connected together" and one sees if the pattern conjured up fits more facts - - including many more facts. The process of judging this, like the process of putting the "explanation" together - happens in people's minds - and can't be forced. But the matching process -- the "connecting of the dots" -- is what effective thinking and persuasion is all about. . . .

Since then, the idea has been worked through, to some degree from different angles, on this thread. This thread has also cited the use of the phrase, and the associated ideas, by others.

More Messages Recent Messages (91 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
 
     
Previous | Next | Sent 

 
 
Copyright © Everyone.net All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy.