New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14914 previous messages)

cantabb - 06:09pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14915 of 14924)

rshow55 - 04:15pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14905 of 14914)

as I was saying . . . People are very much alike because of processes that naturally converge - that usually work very well, and sometimes misfire.

Profound !

The rest (Angier article etc): NO obvious relevance here.

rshow55 - 04:20pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14906 of 14914)

....And yet so violently angry when we happen to find differences between ourselves -and between our groups.

Just inane.

rshow55 - 04:31pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14907 of 14914)

I'm going to take a little time off to get sweaty - and if things go as they have been - this will be covered up with 10-20 more postings - a lot of posting has been happening lately. ..... In ways that make us human - and can sometimes make us fight.

More on your fixation with 'fighting': your teen acivity !

cantabb - 06:18pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14916 of 14924)

klsanford0 - 04:38pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14908 of 14915)

On the Guardian, Showalter complains:

"It seems to me that the highly professional efforts shown in http://www.mrshowalter.net/Cantabb_Srch_to10_4.htm and later postings by cantabb and co-workers - taken as an assembly effort - destroy all hope of a reliable and coherent "connecting of the dots" in a number of the senses set out above by fragmenting and frustrating any orderly "collection of the dots" and ordering of them."

That's what he does: misrepresents positions wherever and whenever he can.

I'm waiting to see him post all this about cantabb on the subway walls. !

klsanford0 - 04:43pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14909 of 14915)

The Guardian, Showalter:

There have been about 600 postings on the NYT Missile Defense thread - and there have been disagreements - perhaps including disagreements that have involved significant efforts from NYT staff. I haven't controlled the pace.

A poster named cantabb has posted on the thread often - and his first 82 postings - starting Sept 17 and continuing up to Oct 4 - are collected at http://www.mrshowalter.net/Cantabb_Srch_to10_4.htm . I've found his efforts, and some coordinated efforts, bracing. There are a number of objections raised - but I believe one of the most important motivations for cantabb and perhaps for employers cantabb may have - is a suggestion I've made that it would be a useful thing, in the public interest - to find out who gisterme is .

Continued obsession with poster identity !

Every poster has been 'asked' by his/her individual employers and others to come here to "fight" with them -- ONLY 2 posters who know what "truth" is, and where does it lie.

Paranoid thinking -- aloud !

Call the ambulance .......

klsanford0 - 06:29pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14917 of 14924)

Hi, cantabb...excellent posts by you as usual....convoluted showalter "logic", you are just here to find out who Gisterme is...

"Call the Ambulance!"

klsanford0 - 06:31pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14918 of 14924)

The reason that there are a lot of posts on this thread is the prodigious output of showalter and his "World Asset"....

jorian319 - 06:35pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14919 of 14924)
"Statements on frequently important subjects are interesting." -rshow55

Look, I "outed" Gisterme just so Robert could give it a rest. Why don't the rest of you, too?

almarst2003 - 07:00pm Oct 13, 2003 EST (# 14920 of 14924)

Prime Minister Tony Blair chaired the meeting where officials decided to confirm the identity of the source of a BBC report that the government had "sexed up" a dossier on Iraq's weapons, a senior civil servant said Monday. http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/10/13/225129-ap.html

Sorry. No more dots left to connect...

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense