New York Times on the Web
Forums Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9397 previous messages)
lchic
- 01:40pm Mar 1, 2003 EST (#
9398 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
If religions are 'virtual patterns' of the mind that offer
users basic order
How are they ranked?
Which best fit modernity?
Where do they fall short - and why?
rshow55
- 07:58pm Mar 1, 2003 EST (#
9399 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Whether you believe in God or not - this is a time where
religious issues are pressing on us.
O Ye of Much Faith! A Triple Dose of Trouble By
LAURIE GOODSTEIN http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/02/weekinreview/02GOOD.html
This is a rare moment in history, like a
planetary alignment: three world religions simultaneously
racked by crisis.
And our ideas an ideals of world order are racked by
crisis, too.
We need to remember what we value - what we care
about - what we are proud of, and remain proud of, when we
think about it, and explain it to other people. We may be able
to do well preserving the good - and reducing risk,
harm, and ugliness.
2162 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.DDr1b0YuYGb.1128381@.f28e622/2687
. So God's Really in the Details? by
Emily Eakin http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/11/arts/11GOD.html
... was a step in that direction - because it explained
probability judgements well - and the fact that ideas can be
"reasonable" - and convincing -- and yet not necessarily be
right based on the argument alone.
When it matters enough, for a practical purpose - people
can check things - and resolve issues worth resolving.
(Clergymen, including my grandfather, have been clear about
that for many generations. Sometimes faith is
indispensible. But sometimes, on practical things, faith is
simply negligence. There needs to be an obligation to
check - and check competently, when it matters enough. )
There's room for improvement, from where we are. And a lot
of people are working hard - from where they are - to deal
with problems. Maybe that's all we'll need to do pretty well.
At least we can work and hope.
Lchic 9401 asks an important question - and I'll try
to respond in more detail in the morning.
almarst2003
- 09:32pm Mar 1, 2003 EST (#
9400 of 17697)
Conservatives began drawing up steroid-fueled plans to
reorder the world a decade ago, imperial blueprints
fantastical enough to make "Star Wars" look achievable.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/opinion/02DOWD.html
(8297 following messages)
New York Times on the Web
Forums Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|