New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(9326 previous messages)
rshow55
- 04:05pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9327 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Fred Rogers, Host of 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood,' Dies
at 74 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/27/obituaries/27WEB-ROGE.html
"His message remained a simple one
throughout the years, telling his viewers to love themselves
and others. On each show, he would take his audience on a
magical trolley ride into the Neighborhood of Make-Believe,
where his puppet creations would interact with each other
and adults.
During the Persian Gulf War, Rogers told
youngsters that "all children shall be well taken care of in
this neighborhood and beyond -- in times of war and in times
of peace," and he asked parents to promise their children
they would always be safe.
Rogers was a master at explaining things to children in
ways that actually worked - and knew how afraid kids actually
were. I wonder how much of the argument about missile defense,
or the invasion of Iraq - Rogers could have put across to his
charges effectively? Maybe a lot. The most basic things - the
most important things - are simple.
Rogers was great at finding ways to say "here, look for
yourself" that worked for kids.
Here is a "connecting of the dots" that I liked when I
wrote it yesterday - and I feel - though people would have to
check and see how it seems to them:
. We ought to think about the behavior
set out in http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/~epritch1/social98a.html
and realize that if we're "wired to be nice" -
that is - to be cooperative - we're also "wired to be
self deceptive and stupid" whenever the immediate
thought seems to go against our cooperative needs.
9314 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.DDr1b0YuYGb.1128091@.f28e622/10848
That seems to me to explain some things succinctly. Maybe
others disagree - and maybe I'd disagree, too - if I
considered it more - and checked how the idea, which seems
simple and right now, actually works. It seems good now.
lchic
- 04:06pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9328 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Australian Defense Minister -- background Lawyer.
Australian Prime Minister -- background Lawyer.
Say 'Let's join Son-of-Starwars'
Australian Opposition --- Listening to American Military
Figures who say it's most often useless ... say 'Let's NOT'!
rshow55
- 04:12pm Feb 27, 2003 EST (#
9329 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Gisterme - I think a problem is how easy it is to
dehumanize and dismiss people - for instance, just dismissing
them as "evil."
Standing up for the group is a great thing to do - but at
times - right answers are distasteful. To anybody. But
sometimes they matter a great deal.
You made an interesting posting yesterday - and I'm going
to respond now
(8368 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|