New York Times on the Web Forums Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

rshow55 - 09:20am Dec 18, 2002 EST (# 6830 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

C.P Snow speaks of

“ . . . the prime importance, in any crisis of action, of being positive, and being able to explain it. It is not so relevant whether you are right or wrong. That is a second-order effect. . . " Science and Government , Ch 11.

We can learn some things about induction that make the issue of right and wrong less of a second order effect. Both practically and morally. The moral and practical senses are linked. We need judgement - and we need procedures for making judgements - and judging how much we can trust them. rshow55 8/27/02 12:21pm

An absolutely key thing was beautifully expressed by Klinkenborg:

. every human activity, serious or playful, eventually ramifies into a world of its own, a self-contained cosmos of enormous complexity.

When should we trust what's in the "self-contained cosmos" of our minds? Most of the time - we're too busy to ask - and things go well enough that we don't have to. But when things go wrong - when it matters enough -- we have to ask.

How is it that people can do as well as they do - knowing how stupid they often are - and how little they know directly?

That's Plato's problem - something dealt with many times on this thread, and much connected to the questions raised in Iraq Makes a Philosophically Flawed Effort to Disprove a Negative By EMILY EAKIN http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/weekinreview/15EAKI.html

Here are links connected to Plato's problem from this thread:

6208 rshow55 11/23/02 9:38am ... 4822 rshow55 10/12/02 9:30am
4172 rshow55 9/4/02 10:23am ... 4164-66 rshow55 9/4/02 6:45am
4153 rshowalt 9/3/02 9:15am ... 4105 rshow55 9/1/02 5:16pm
4073 rshow55 8/31/02 10:32am ... 4051-54 rshow55 8/31/02 7:17am
4003-4 rshow55 8/29/02 6:01pm ... 3991-2 rshow55 8/26/02 6:44pm
3971-2 rshow55 8/24/02 5:46pm ... 3702-3 rshow55 8/13/02 3:58pm

2345-50 rshow55 5/22/02 1:16pm
2345-50 rshow55 5/22/02 1:16pm
2345-50 rshow55 5/22/02 1:16pm
2345-50 rshow55 5/22/02 1:16pm

2310 rshow55 5/19/02 1:51pm ... 790-93 crossmaster 12/18/02 9:06am

If I didn't believe that we were approaching much clearer, more usable solutions to Plato's problem, I'd be stripped of what Commondata calls my "relentless optimism" - - - but "playing the game" in my head as best I can, it seems to me that some new and hopeful things - simple things - may be coming into focus - in a form that many people can use.

A key point, and a central one for me - is this. How can we get patterns of discourse to converge - and converge on humanly satisfactory answers - where convergence has typically failed before?

A big

rshow55 - 09:23am Dec 18, 2002 EST (# 6831 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

A big part of the answer, it seems to me is to "keep talking."

The long and the short of it, I think, is that you need both long and short. The long, the "enormous complexity" comes first. Very often, in human experience, good things converge.

The question - what does convergence take is a question that often has clear answers - and clear requirements. A central requirement now - on the BIG problems - is we need more staffing, more clarity, and more resources than are being brought to bear now.

The truth can be "somehow, too weak."

If truth - or workable patterns - takes logical effort and crossmatching - the effort can simply be insufficient. And consequences can be worse than they'd otherwise have to be.

(10866 following messages)

New York Times on the Web Forums Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense