New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (6769 previous messages)

lunarchick - 03:16am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6770 of 17697)

Jayne goes with Tazan

    They swing
    through
    international
    jungle
    untangling the vines
    where others
    just bungle!
ti: Pacing Cheetah

lchic2002

lunarchick - 03:25am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6771 of 17697)

'The Poster' asks if one might be 'away for Christmas' ..

    Poster i reside downUnder ... Home is 'Away' ...
    Do we hear a 'please may i be excused' from the Poster
    Next he'll be telling us
    he knows Santa's toymaker ...

    Does 'cobblers' cover it?
    :)

kalter.rauch - 05:58am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6772 of 17697)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

bbbuck 12/16/02 11:52am

...what's the status on the anti-[communist] campaign?

Sehr Gut, Herr Oberst!!!

Sie Machiavellian Principle...Divide and Conquer UND Planting Seeds of Doubt in their midst ist proceeding most expeditiously, Mein Herr!!!

Sturm GEFAHR fur die Bolshevist Schweinerein!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

commondata - 06:34am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6773 of 17697)

Kalter - see http://dan.hersam.com/opinions/exclamation.html

almarst2002 - 08:09am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6774 of 17697)

Iraq Sanctions: Humanitarian Implications and Options for the Future - http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/iraq1/2002/paper.htm

"The 1977 Protocols to the Geneva Conventions on the laws of war include a prohibition of economic sieges against civilians as a method of warfare. Ironically, legal consensus does not yet define economic sanctions as subject to these laws, which apply in warfare and which legally require belligerents to target military rather than civilian objectives. Sanctions operate in a hazy legal status between war and peace. (9) Unlike the dramatic, visible toll of military action, sanctions take their effect gradually, indirectly and with low visibility. "

rshow55 - 08:09am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6775 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Republicans Say Lott Lacks Bush's Support By CARL HULSE with ELISABETH BUMILLER http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/17/politics/17LOTT.html

There are obviously many, many "low" calculations going on, in many minds and many groups involved with the Lott matter, but even so, I believe that the responses described above are good examples of human beings, under stress, making adjustments well - and that applies to Mr. Lott's responses, as well as the responses of others.

Senator Lott is exactly correct that he was not responsible for the society that he was born in - though he, like all of us, become increasingly resonsible for what happens, as we acquire power and make decisions.

If problems involving international law, military balances, and dissemination and discussion of information, worldwide, were conducted as well as the negotiations as described in http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/17/politics/17LOTT.html - - a great deal could be made a great deal better - without the people involved becoming either geniuses or angels.

I disagree, sometimes, with almarst - but if patterns of international discourse could rise to the standard of some actions described in http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/17/politics/17LOTT.html - very many of his concerns, and commondata's concerns could be much better addressed than they are today.

almarst2002 - 08:11am Dec 17, 2002 EST (# 6776 of 17697)

If You're Happy And You Know It Bomb Iraq - http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1216-06.htm

More Messages Recent Messages (10921 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense