New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5394 previous messages)

rshow55 - 06:38am Oct 31, 2002 EST (# 5395 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

5307 rshow55 10/27/02 11:59am
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/0

5308 rshow55 10/27/02 1:11pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/405
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/406

5358 rshow55 10/28/02 6:19pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/350
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/352
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/357
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/365
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/383

5364 rshow55 10/28/02 9:30pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/312
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/321
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/331
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/332
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/289
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/346

5365 rshow55 10/28/02 9:49pm
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/354
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/357
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364

5380 rshow55 10/30/02 11:34am
Anything on Anything - 70 posts from c http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.eea14e1/1253 c to http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.eea14e1/1318 on negotiating tactics that could use the internet.

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/719 to http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7726f/806

rshow55 - 07:26am Oct 31, 2002 EST (# 5396 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The links above have also been posted on the Guardian Talk thread - Psychwarfare, Casablanca . . . and terror .

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@173.Ur0Qb22UbbW.4@.ee7a163/374

I very much appreciate the openness and high journalistic standards of both the Guardian-Observer and The New York Times .

commondata - 07:37am Oct 31, 2002 EST (# 5397 of 17697)

rshow55 10/31/02 5:41am

The Guardian have a small piece mentioning Gaiacomm Corporation today which you can find here. They've been caught trying to solicit cash from Saddam Hussain, presumably after failing to obtain funds from the Department of Defense which they seem quite upset about.

Their first press release was picked up, without comment, by Physics Web and Cellular News. The CEO calls himself Judah Ben-Hur and that press release claimed that:

One [facet of their technology] is the use as a weapon to ignite large sections of the atmosphere and incinerate all living creatures within its pre selected coordinates.

Having listened to what you've said about microwave weapons I was wondering, on a scale from 1 to bbbuck, exactly how deranged these people are. A "technical" summary of their ideas is available here. If you don't think they're deranged, Robert, you could consider the following [:-)]

Gaiacomm Corporation is looking for top physicists and telecommunications engineers who want to use their knowledge for peace and new development, not the same-old same-old boring technologies of years past.

More Messages Recent Messages (12300 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense