New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (5363 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:30pm Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5364 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/312

A number of pieces have run in the NYT that I've been glad to see, perhaps this one most of all:

Playing Know and Tell by John Schwartz http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/09/weekinreview/09BOXA.html .

Schwartz's piece ends:

" Listen. "

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/321

I've been doing the best I could, under supervised circumstances. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/331

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/332

Maybe I'm "Ismael" - - http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/289 - - that could be checked - - - and whatever the answer, the work remains http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/346

MD1999 rshow55 5/4/02 9:39am

I'm proud of the work done, and I think lchic and The New York Times should be, as well.

rshow55 - 09:49pm Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5365 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Just to add flavor to the "fiction" - I posted this:

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/354

and this: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/357 . . http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/364

Some things ought to be checked - - for the sake of the United States, and the whole world.

I've been trying to Send in clear rshowalter "Science News Poetry" 2/14/01 7:18am for a long time. The poem of rshowalter "Science News Poetry" 2/14/01 7:18am ends with this note:

In clear: Lying is more dangerous than people think, and soaks up more attention than people know. We can do less of it. We can send in clear - the message, almost always, will be peaceful. And complex cooperation, now so often terminated with deceptive sequences, could happen more often.

If the Guardian, the NYT, and some other first line papers got together (with foundation support if that was needed) and got some things checked we could live in a much safer and more humane world.

bbbuck - 10:33pm Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5366 of 17697)

Go back to the guardian you ridiculous piece of slop.

bbbuck - 10:35pm Oct 28, 2002 EST (# 5367 of 17697)

And take that moron - ludicrouschic with you.

lchic - 12:44am Oct 29, 2002 EST (# 5368 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

GU | """They should have told the doctors about the gas immediately," said Tatiana Sorkhina, 36, who did not know any of the victims. "The gas was necessary," she added, "as the crisis was ended quickly and could have been a lot scarier." She did not think there should be reprisals in Chechnya. "The Chechens are also a normal people, like the Russians. They are both good and bad."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,2763,821330,00.html

kalter.rauch - 03:07am Oct 29, 2002 EST (# 5369 of 17697)
Earth vs <^> <^> <^>

rshow55 10/28/02 9:42am

The refined civility of your sophistry may lure the gullible newcomer to this forum like a fly to a spider's web...with the enticing blandishments of lchic as bait......

......but the wary, wise to the wiles of the world's ways, will shun your "logic" as the sickening-sweet scent of decay, even as it attracts the common fly......

More Messages Recent Messages (12328 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense