New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(5092 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:20pm Oct 20, 2002 EST (#
5093 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Perhaps things are going very well, and international
discussions are going well. If you take Iraq at its word,
subject to checking that if offers - - we are a long way from
a justification for war:
Iraq States Its Case By MOHAMMED ALDOURI http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/17/opinion/17ALDO.html
"After so many years of fear from war, the
threat of war and suffering, the people of Iraq and their
government in Baghdad are eager for peace. We have no
intention of attacking anyone, now or in the future, with
weapons of any kind. If we are attacked, we will surely
defend ourselves with all means possible. But bear in mind
that we have no nuclear or biological or chemical weapons,
and we have no intention of acquiring them.
"We are not asking the people of the United
States or of any member state of the United Nations to trust
in our word, but to send the weapons inspectors to our
country to look wherever they wish unconditionally.
They're saying "you don't have to trust us - - you can
check us." We shouldn't be reluctant to do that - and to
remember how many different ways there are to check and
cross-check. If the UN gets something like active cooperation
from Iraq - there may be some hidden residual capacities - but
there won't be much - and Iraq will not be in a good position
to use anything it has left in any militarily sane way.
Iraq has made a major concession - both moral and practical
- in its amnesty.
Iraq Announces Amnesty for Its Prisoners By THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Iraq.html
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- "The Iraqi government
announced an amnesty Sunday for all Iraqi prisoners . . "
One need not trust Saddam, nor like him, to think that
Hussein and Mobs Virtually Empty Iraq's Prisons By JOHN
F. BURNS http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/21/international/middleeast/21IRAQ.html
reports an act of great consequence.
If Iraq can effectively reintegrate those prisoners, it
will show a distinct "regime change" in the ways that matter
to many, many people.
. . .
Iraq has offered to be checked and tested. That testing is
coming. It started today. Perhaps this is a time, not only for
care, but also for hope. Secular Redemption http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/391
will be hard, this time - - but it is interesting that the
leaders of Iraq are standing up to the challenge - not sitting
passively by.
. . . .
The North Koreans are not sitting passively by either. This
is a time for hope - and good judgement. Perhaps a good time
for a sermon.
. When the foundations are shaking.
http://www.wisc.edu/rshowalt/sermon.html
I like the whole of James Slatton's sermon - but after the
first nine minutes - it is mostly secular.
The last thirty seconds - are particularly memorable - and
the last word - which resonates for me. . . .
Judgement.
We could use some judgement. Some care. Some luck, too.
lchic
- 10:46pm Oct 20, 2002 EST (#
5094 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Iraq Iran ... an interesting thought:
If Iran is run by committee - religious elders
(somewhat out of step with the mass of their population), yet
holding power via the returns from oil as recently noted in a
Friedman-Op-Ed
And Iraq is run by a one-man-President - again
financed by oil
Then in a race which will move faster the
Iran | 'commitee - flowing against the will of it's
people' or Iraq | directed by a President
Just looking on, it would seem that were the
President of Iraq to have visions of a great future for his
country, then, he might be in a position to move ahead faster
than Iran.
And, now his personal wealth is in place, then the guy
could move for Status and a place in history.
To do that he needs a strategic plan that ensures Iraq's
future.
As I've stated (above) much of the knowledge of the past
century that was hard won, is now freely available. The tools
of economic peace are there fot the using of.
~~~~~~~
Not knowing the real previous relationship between Saddam
and the USA .... it may well be that he casts his past actions
in the light of the 'unknown USA foreign policy' ... whatever
it was, where-ever it lies ... perhaps a part of those
10billion documents kept under lock and key labelled 'never to
be released' somewhere in Washington.
lchic
- 10:51pm Oct 20, 2002 EST (#
5095 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Iraq moving to release 'most' prisoners will provide
interesting year-end statistics .... per 100,000 head of
population .... how will Iraq compare with the 680+ and 640+
detainees of the USA and RU respectively?
The thousands released back into the population can now
assist to turn Iraq's economic wheels ... providing investment
is forthcoming.
(12602 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|