New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4601 previous messages)

mazza9 - 06:58pm Sep 27, 2002 EST (# 4602 of 17697)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Or how about this one. Iraq has used chemical weapons, (oops gave the answer away!)in the past against its enemies. Al Quida sources have stated that Iraq has given chemcial weapon information/training to Al Quida terrorists. Can you connect the Dots...(not the movie candy this time)? Why don't you go back to your whining about "Bill Casey and the CIA that done you wrong?"

lchic - 12:04am Sep 28, 2002 EST (# 4603 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

There are people - alive over the past twenty years - suffering the effects of chemical weapons:

http://www.oneworld.net/guides/cbweapons/front.shtml

    ''After the two bombings of the town, that day, children and grown up women and men started to vomit blood,'' the statement said.
    It said a number of pregnant women in the affected region have suffered miscarriages, while cattle, sheep, goats and birds have been dying in large numbers.

lchic - 12:24am Sep 28, 2002 EST (# 4604 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Clinton was advised - letter April 1997 - that 'Top Brass' USA forces were against Chemical Weapons ... Colin Powell a signature.

lchic - 01:20am Sep 28, 2002 EST (# 4605 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

A gem of a contribution to today's forum ran thus

    Even Enstein, while not as busy as you mazza presumably are, still found it useful to think ...
Enrol here http://www.ed.gov/thinkcollege/ After which everyone will say Hes truly amazing http://www.astrolog.org/labyrnth.htm

Everone excepting prioners ... oOOOps .. prisoners see Rule 10 - be forgiving of other peoples mistakes

lchic - 02:19am Sep 28, 2002 EST (# 4606 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Double Entry Book-Keeping isn't the new kid on the block, it's 1000 years old!


"" Lawyers for the General Accounting Office and Vice President Dick Cheney clashed today before a federal judge here over which branch of government's claim is paramount: the executive power to keep records confidential or the legislative right to investigate how public money is spent.

For the first time in the 81-year history of the agency, the auditing arm of Congress, the comptroller general of the United States went to federal court to ask a judge to order a member of the executive branch to turn over records to Congress.

.... a 22-year-old law allowed the comptroller general to "investigate all matters related to the receipt, disbursement and use of public money."

He also contended that the law gives the comptroller general the right to obtain all "information the comptroller requires about the duties, powers, activities, organization and financial transactions" of the agency under investigation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/28/politics/28CHEN.html

." But the information was essential, he said, for the agency to do its job to "look over the shoulder" of the executive branch as it spent taxpayers' money.

"How do you engage in a meaningful oversight function of the way public funds are spent if you cannot look at the highest level of the executive branch?" Mr. Phillips said.


Phillips should look - both Bush($__m) and Cheney ($36m) gutted their former companies - shareholders in America-inc want a report on 'The $state of the Nation'!

If the USA looks open, transparent, and honest ... who knows ... it might reflect well via world Sharemarkets.

More Messages Recent Messages (13091 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense