New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4294 previous messages)
rshow55
- 05:14pm Sep 13, 2002 EST (#
4295 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Posted a summary of the last week:
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/337
-- http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/338
I think lchic
9/12/02 9:21pm is brilliant, and I'm trying to respond.
A lot of people are stumped - and more and more people are
coming to know it -and admit it. If some mistakes and concerns
can be admitted - - we could do better.
Americans have some imperfections - people notice them
sometimes - and I have noticed some American imperfections
sometimes, myself. These imperfections are sometimes denied,
more often than they should be. But many of the most
fundamental difficulties and impasses are in the Islamic
nations.
A lot of people in the Islamic nations know that very well
- - and some adjustments are working, more or less -- but
there's a lot of tension, a lot of unhappiness, and enough
craziness that 9/11/2001 happened. And the denials of
responsibility have happened.
Diplomacy (in the sense of evasion of fundamentals) is
sometimes useful, but it can carry things only so far.
The United Nation was formed primarily to prevent the
tragedies of the first and second world wars - and especially
the horror of Hitler. It assumes modern usages -
especially a willingness and ability to accomodate facts, take
responsibility for actions, and keep agreements.
When modern usages and levels of rationality can't be
assumed - nations with the capacity to defend themselves can
be expected to do so. Suppose Idi Amin were still around, and
close to getting a nuclear weapon? Most people in the West, I
believe, would want to keep that from happening -- and want
that enough to bend or break international law, if necessary.
The United Nations is supposed to work . That's not
an argument for invading Iraq -- but it is an argument
for finding a way for the international community to assert
reasonable power - if it expects respect for its power.
http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/338
includes this:
. If we lied less -- if truth broke out
-- peace might break out, too.
Here are facts that it seem to me are basic - things that
we all know - and have to know at some level - from about the
time we learn to talk. It seems to me that these basic things
are too often ignored.
People say and do things.
What people say and do have consequences,
for themselves and for other people.
People need to deal with and understand
these consequences, for all sorts of practical, down to
earth reasons.
. Every individual, and every group, has
a stake in right answers on questions of fact that they have
to use as assumptions for what they say and do.
There are plenty of cases where the United States needs to
learn this - and needs to face inconvenient or awkward truths.
But there are no solutions to key problems if only
Americans are asked to face facts. The Islamic nations - - and
their religious leaders - have to be responsible for what
they say and do, as well. If you look at the Arab
countries - and how little they've done with their advantages
- and how poor in material things and spirit their people are
- - it seems clear that they have to "look in the
mirror" too.
rshow55
- 05:15pm Sep 13, 2002 EST (#
4296 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Here's part of an undelivered speech by Franklin D.
Roosevelt, written shortly before his death:
" Today, we are faced with the
pre-eminent fact that, if civilization is to survive, we
must cultivate the science of human relationships --- the
ability of all peoples, of all kinds, to live together and
work together in the same world, at peace."
This quote was on the last page of the American Heritage
Picture History of World War II , by C.L.
Sulzberger and the editors of American Heritage ,
published in 1966.
Sometimes, for unavoidable reasons - that will require us
to learn to acknowledge some shared facts. Human
relationships, often enough, cannot be peacefully sustained
without them.
When all the Iraqis can do is shout "liar" - - without
sensible details -- they are cornered - not only militarily,
but logically and morally, too -- and their leaders are worthy
of little respect. The Iraqis signed an agreement renouncing
weapons of mass destruction - - the whole world supported that
agreement -- and they should be held to it.
The Bush administration should be held to some agreements,
too. Americans should insist on it. So should people of other
nations. But it is not only the Bush administration that
needs to deal on the basis of the truth - especially when the
truth can be checked, focused, and determined beyond a decent
doubt.
Again, I think lchic
9/12/02 9:21pm is brilliant, and I'm going to respond
later in detail.
(13401 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|