New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(4126 previous messages)
rshow55
- 10:24am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4127 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
If Cooper wants to argue "don't have to believe you - I can
dismiss you." - - - that works, to a degree. But not always.
Somebody could sue somebody. Some politician or journalist
might ask a question that couldn't be avoided. And rules could
change.
3640 rshow55
8/11/02 1:54pm ... 3643 rshow55
8/11/02 2:03pm
3664 rshow55
8/12/02 10:45am
"Americans need to be WORTHY of the GOOD
THINGS people associate with this flag - - not just wave
it. . . http://www.awolbush.com/usaflag1.gif
. Our allies, and people all over the world, should be able to
expect that. And able to check that. . . . On missile defense
issues, and other issues that matter enough.
Sometimes, that means things have to be checked. Even if
somebody has to go to some effort - to work through chains of
evidence. Trials do that pretty well, fairly often. And this
thread works well as pretrial discovery.
lchic
- 10:24am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4128 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
PIAGET
http://www.papert.com/articles/Papertonpiaget.html
"" ... Piaget's theory - four stages; Sensorimotor
(birth to 2 years), Preoperational (2 to 7
years, Concrete Operational(7 to 11 or 12 years)
and Formal Operations (11 or 12 to about 15 years) http://www.georgewiles.com/massey/html/cogdev.htm
communication models - http://www.brocku.ca/commstudies/courses/2F50/jakobson.html
http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP1/TP1-17.HTML
http://www.nonviolentcommunication.com/BookPages/nvcmodel.html
http://search.ninemsn.com.au/results.asp?cfg=SMCINITIAL&RS=CHECKED&v=1&srch=5&FORM=AS5&q=Piaget+%2D+four
wrcooper
- 10:28am Sep 2, 2002 EST (#
4129 of 17697)
Showalter:
I am not saying I disbelieve you. I am simply asking
you to substantiate your claim, which struck me as numerically
fuzzy.
Stop stalling. Nobody's going to be fooled by your
deliberate obfuscation and temporizing.
I want to believe you. Therefore, identify your
sources so that I can independently verify them. How did you
com e up with the numbers?
(13568 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|