New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (4126 previous messages)

rshow55 - 10:24am Sep 2, 2002 EST (# 4127 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

If Cooper wants to argue "don't have to believe you - I can dismiss you." - - - that works, to a degree. But not always.

Somebody could sue somebody. Some politician or journalist might ask a question that couldn't be avoided. And rules could change.

3640 rshow55 8/11/02 1:54pm ... 3643 rshow55 8/11/02 2:03pm

3664 rshow55 8/12/02 10:45am

"Americans need to be WORTHY of the GOOD THINGS people associate with this flag - - not just wave it. . . http://www.awolbush.com/usaflag1.gif . Our allies, and people all over the world, should be able to expect that. And able to check that. . . . On missile defense issues, and other issues that matter enough.

Sometimes, that means things have to be checked. Even if somebody has to go to some effort - to work through chains of evidence. Trials do that pretty well, fairly often. And this thread works well as pretrial discovery.

lchic - 10:24am Sep 2, 2002 EST (# 4128 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

PIAGET

http://www.papert.com/articles/Papertonpiaget.html

"" ...
Piaget's theory - four stages;
Sensorimotor (birth to 2 years),
Preoperational (2 to 7 years,
Concrete Operational(7 to 11 or 12 years) and
Formal Operations (11 or 12 to about 15 years)
http://www.georgewiles.com/massey/html/cogdev.htm

communication models -
http://www.brocku.ca/commstudies/courses/2F50/jakobson.html
http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP1/TP1-17.HTML
http://www.nonviolentcommunication.com/BookPages/nvcmodel.html

http://search.ninemsn.com.au/results.asp?cfg=SMCINITIAL&RS=CHECKED&v=1&srch=5&FORM=AS5&q=Piaget+%2D+four

wrcooper - 10:28am Sep 2, 2002 EST (# 4129 of 17697)

Showalter:

I am not saying I disbelieve you. I am simply asking you to substantiate your claim, which struck me as numerically fuzzy.

Stop stalling. Nobody's going to be fooled by your deliberate obfuscation and temporizing.

I want to believe you. Therefore, identify your sources so that I can independently verify them. How did you com e up with the numbers?

More Messages Recent Messages (13568 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense