New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3940 previous messages)

rshow55 - 05:17pm Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3941 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

When I say that I think lchic and I are doing important work on "connecting the dots" - I mean "important, in my opinion, judging from what I know based on these references, some others like them, some thought and some experience."

Lerner, Richard M. CONCEPTS AND THEORIES OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 2nd edition Random House, New York, 1986.

Lindley, D. The End of Physics: the myth of a unified theory HarperCollins, NY. 1993

Lorayne, Harry and Lucas, Jerry THE MEMORY BOOK Ballantine Books, New York, 1974

Lubeck, S. Sandbox Society: early education in black and white america - a comparative ethnography Falmer Press, London 1985

Ma, S.K. MODERN THEORY OF CRITICIAL PHENOMENA Benjamin, Reading MA. 1976

Miller, G. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus of Minus Two” Psychological Review 1956 63: 81-97.

Milner, R "Elements of Interaction," Turing Award Lecture, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM , 36, 1, Jan. 1993

Minsky, M. and Papert, S. PERCEPTRONS , MIT Press, 1969.

Moyers, Bill A World of Ideas: Conversations with thoughful men and women Doubleday, NY 1989

Nagel, E. and Newman, J.R. Godel's Proof NYU Press 1958

rshow55 - 05:18pm Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3942 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

When I say that I think lchic and I are doing important work on "connecting the dots" - I mean "important, in my opinion, judging from what I know based on these references, some others like them, some thought and some experience."

Nauta, W.J.H and Feirtag, M. Fundamental Neuroanatomy W.H. Freeman, NY 1986

Penrose, Roger THE EMPEROR’S NEW MIND: CONCERNING COMPUTERS, MINDS, AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS, Oxford U. Press, 1989

Phillips, D.C. The Social Scientist's Bestiary: A guide to fabled threats to, and defenses of, naturalistic social science Permagon Press, NY. 1992

Piatelli-Palmarini, M. Inevitable Illusions: how mistakes of reason rule our minds John Wiley, NY. 1994

Raichle, M.E. “Automaticity: from reflective to reflexive information processing in the human brain.” in COGNITION, COMPUTATION, AND CONSCIOUSNESS M. Ito, Y.Miyashita, and E.T. Rolls, eds. Oxford U. Press, 1997, pp137-148

Regan, David HUMAN BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine Elsevior, 1989.

Rieke, F. , Warland, D. , van Stevenick and Bailek Spikes: exploring the neural code MIT Press, Cambridge Ma 1999

Ries, A. and Trout, J. The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing Harper 1993

Rosenstark, S. TRANSMISSION LINES IN COMPUTER ENGINEERING , McGraw-Hill Series in Computer Engineering, 1994.

rshow55 - 05:18pm Aug 23, 2002 EST (# 3943 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

When I say that I think lchic and I are doing important work on "connecting the dots" - I mean "important, in my opinion, judging from what I know based on these references, some others like them, some thought and some experience."

Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition V.1 MIT Press 1988

Rumelhart, D.E., Smolensky, P, McClelland, J.L, and Hinton, G.E. “Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models” Chapter 14, V.2 in PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING v. 2, op. cit.

Sejnowski, T.J. “Open Questions About Computation in Cerebral Cortex” Ch. 21 in PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING , v. 2 op. cit.

Sasha D. and Lazere, C Out of Their Minds: The lives and discoveries of 15 great computer scientists Springer-Verlag, NY 1995

Siegler, Robert. S. CHILDREN’S THINKING 3d ed. Prentice-Hall, 1998.

Simon, H.A. MODELS OF THOUGHT Yale U. Press, 1979.

Simon, H.A. Models of My Life Basic Books, NY. 1991

Snow, C.P. Science and Government Harvard U. Press, 1960

Snow, C.P. The Two Cultures - and a second look Cambridge U. Press 1959, 1964

Steinberg, Jacques “CLASHING OVER EDUCATION’S ONE TRUE FAITH: Public debates on teaching posit stark pedagogical choices. But teachers ask, “Why choose?” WEEK IN REVIEW, Sunday, Dec 14, 1997, THE NEW YORK TIMES.

More Messages Recent Messages (13754 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense