New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(3329 previous messages)
rshow55
- 08:34am Jul 29, 2002 EST (#
3330 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Sometime, after 8:08 pm yesterday, and before wrcooper
7/28/02 9:27pm , "wrcooper" removed 22 of his
postings, dating from July 15th (just before my main computer
was knocked down.) I have the postings.
These postings represent serious effort on "wrcooper"'s
part, and are neither casual nor honest.
I think most reasonable people reading these postings (and
the way they associate in logic and time with Mazza's) -- and
looking at the great efforts in them to defame me, and to
defend and even glorfy George Johnson - would conclude what
I've concluded.
I conclude that there is a very high likelyhood - not far
short of a certainty - that wrcooper, kalter.rauch, mazza, and
dirac are pseudonyms for George Johnson.
I believe that, because of postings on this thread since
September 2000, especially those just deleted, and also
because of very extensive private correspondence supporting
the same inference.
For a lot of reasons, that inference should be
checked. It can be.
I have the postings, and am looking at them.
This is a serious matter, and I'm dealing with it
carefully.
lchic
- 10:40am Jul 29, 2002 EST (#
3331 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
GJ
Dreaming
mazza9
- 10:59am Jul 29, 2002 EST (#
3332 of 17697) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
Kalter:
The real question is whether RShowalter=RShow55=RShowalt!
Who
is the multiple personality?
Maybe a mythology has been created by Robert and his
sidechic= lchic.
LuigiMazza
rshow55
- 12:32pm Jul 29, 2002 EST (#
3333 of 17697) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
RShowalter=RShow55=RShowalt . . . . I don't think there's
been any doubt of that.
I notice that mazza9
7/29/02 11:59am , makes a "joke" -- but makes no effort to
deny or in any way dispute what I call " a very high
likelyhood - not far short of a certainty - that wrcooper,
kalter.rauch, mazza, and dirac are pseudonyms for George
Johnson." rshow55
7/29/02 9:34am
Some things ought to be checked. Because a good deal is
involved.
Involved for me and the AEA investors of course -- and for
Johnson, the "family man" wrcooper defended so
actively.
But the national interest - and some significant interests
of the New York Times are also involved.
Sorting out the truth, on a relatively few checkable
points, would be worth a lot.
I've been playing it as straight and as honorably as I've
known how. On issues where the stakes have been high.
For example. It appears very likely indeed (and this can be
checked) that Condoleeza Rice has participated very actively
on this thread -- which would mean that George Bush, and
others high in the administration know about it, and care
about it. Given some of the things gisterme has said
and done (some, but not all, to his-her credit) that's an
interesting question. Interesting in terms of national and
international politics.
There are some other issues, too. Things worth checking.
The things that Eisenhower warned about in his FAREWELL
ADDRESS of January 17, 1961 http://www.geocities.com/~newgeneration/ikefw.htm
have happened. Getting some facts straight aobut what's
happened on this thread, and checkable things I've said
could take us a long way towards getting some important things
fixed.
MD3295-96 rshowalt
7/26/02 7:15pm
I'm thinking about some questions.
What would "the average reader of The New
York Times " want me to do now?
What would Bill Casey want me to do?
It seems to me that the answers involve getting some facts
straight, about what has happened. I was asked to do a
dangerous, hard job - a long time ago - under conditions
where, again and again, I'd have to struggle with
credentialling problems. I'm working to keep my promises - and
take reasonable care of myself, as well.
lchic
- 02:37pm Jul 29, 2002 EST (#
3334 of 17697) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
lchic
"Science in the News" 7/29/02 3:34pm
(14363 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
|