New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (3315 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:07pm Jul 28, 2002 EST (# 3316 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

People near the masthead of the NYT know who "Mr. XXXXXXXX" is in 2472 rshow55 6/6/02 9:23pm . . . - and could check a good deal of detail.

2472 rshow55 6/6/02 9:23pm ... 2473 rshow55 6/6/02 9:27pm
2474 rshow55 6/6/02 9:29pm ... 2475 rshow55 6/6/02 9:32pm
2476 rshow55 6/6/02 9:33pm

2477 rshow55 6/6/02 11:21pm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22380-2002Feb16.html

2478 applez101 6/8/02 1:30pm

It is interesting what's happened since. I wish I had taken a recording of the conversation I had with CIA, that occurred after the letter above. They care. It included something like the following: (I'm quoting from memory, but I have an idea that NYT people, if they wish, might get to hear the transcript.)

From CIA representative (who felt strongly that I was not to contact Mr. XXXXX) ....Q. "Do you hate us?"

My answer (maybe with some hesitation - because I hadn't been able to disclose the details of 2770 rshow55 6/29/02 7:59am : "No."

CIA Representative: "You could take the whole agency down, you know that?" ( Or something to that effect. )

My answer was something to the effect that "that wasn't what I had in mind."

I think it is fair to say that the conversation wasn't casual. And though it wouldn't be the idea deal, from any reasonable point of view, if I had in writing , or readily checkable, the assurances I was given verbally -- many of my needs would be met.

rshow55 - 07:08pm Jul 28, 2002 EST (# 3317 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

In addition to the "crazy Showalter hypothesis" I think people ought to consider the "Ishmael hypothesis."

MD2476 rshow55 6/6/02 9:32pm .... http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/289 and http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/294 :

" "The story I like best about me, in this regard, is that I'm just a guy who got interested in logic, and military issues. A guy who got concerned about nuclear danger, and related military balances, and tried to do something about it. Based on what he knew - with no access to special information of any kind, he made an effort to keep the world from blowing up, using the best literary devices he could fashion, consistent with what he knew or could guess. "

Maybe that's a "story" worth telling, now that the government has screwed up so much, so many ways, and people have stolen so much so that nothing can be checked.

To find out whether or not it is a "story" or not, things would have to be checked. In the United States of America, when security issues are even tangentially involved, can anything be checked? What does this say about the limits on what "insiders" can steal?

Of course, I don't have the credentials the NYT most values - and rightly values.

Even so, if I were the NYT, I'd look closely on the origins of Texas oil fortunes -- and the details of how the far right wing of the republican party came to be so very well funded.

I say that sincerely . In Virginia, Young Conservatives Learn How to Develop and Use Their Political Voices by BLAINE HARDEN http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/11/politics/11CONS.html

wrcooper - 08:27pm Jul 28, 2002 EST (# 3318 of 17697)

Whatever. God speed.

lchic - 08:36pm Jul 28, 2002 EST (# 3319 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=godspeed


More Messages Recent Messages (14378 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense