New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (1601 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:22pm Apr 21, 2002 EST (# 1602 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

rshowalt - 05:28pm Sep 25, 2000 EDT (#304 of 396)

I'd be grateful for a chance to come before you, or one or more of your representatives, and explain, in detail, with documentation and ways to check, how dangerous this situation is. Especially if a good reporter, and a videotape record, were there so what was said was clear.

Some mistakes have been made, and you and I weren't very old when they were made. They can be fixed. A lot of things would improve if this were done. They are American mistakes, and Americans, and American leaders, have to fix them.

  • * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * *

    A lot has happened since September 25, 2000 - - and I believe that some of it has been good. We're more aware of the reality and dangers of weapons of mass destruction now. People are looking for solutions. The desire for missile defense is based on very real fears and concerns -- that need to be adressed effectively. I was therefore very grateful to see Mazza's question, which I'm reposting now.

    lchic - 02:27pm Apr 21, 2002 EST (# 1603 of 17697)
    ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

    Noticed that that NUKE ME State is trying to stop good experienced people from asking questions ... Mary ROBINSON etc ...

    Also note that American people including American-Arabs xPalestine have to work hard to provide Israel with $10million per day(JimmyCarterNYT) ... didn't i say above that Israel has NO sense of the VALUE of money .. if just falls from the pockest of 'out of their trees' US gift-givers!

    mAzzA's word of the day http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=eschew

    mAzzA - don't know if you've go ' 'Roos loose in the top padock' or what ... time wise it's not yet daylight/DAWN in my world zone !

    Glad you liked the Cassey links RS - looks as if they guy missed 'retirement call' ... people hang in when they don't want others to 'check'!

    rshow55 - 02:28pm Apr 21, 2002 EST (# 1604 of 17697)
    Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

    MD1595 mazza9 4/21/02 2:23pm asks an excellent, much appreciated question --

    "RShow55:

    " For the sake of discussion, (notice that I eschew the use of the word "argument"), "What benefits would accrue if the Missile Defense Programs were eliminated?

    "LouMazza

    I'll be working hard to answer that question now, in more detail than in MD1596 rshow55 4/21/02 3:01pm .

    rshow55 - 02:31pm Apr 21, 2002 EST (# 1605 of 17697)
    Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

    lchic 4/21/02 3:27pm - - whatever else can be said, the Israelis know the value of money, and have used their aid money efficiently in military terms (though, according to Jimmy Carter today, in violation of their agreements.) I've known some Israelis who are very effective people.

    mazza9 - 03:20pm Apr 21, 2002 EST (# 1606 of 17697)
    "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

    RShow55:

    I appreicate the reposts. Excuse me if I observe that in some respects they are naive. There isn't a military person who would rather not have to exercise their skills. But as you point out, many military leaders like Alexander seek conquest not "civil society". Alexander, Hitler, Saddam, Pol Pot, et al are examples.

    Many of us left the military after Viet Nam because of the misuse of the military by the polical leaders. Imagine if the money spent on that fools errand had been spent in giving developemental aid instead. Of course, the policatl dynamic was still there and one side saw the military as the only solution since they eschewed the ballot box!

    There are 1 Billion Muslims, (when did they stop being Moslems?) and they frighten me because they have telegraphed, (or air mailed!!WTC), their intentions. I read on a church billboard that "Hate does not combat hate". How many millenia must the Jews turn the other cheek.

    Ain't easy times.

    LouMazza

    More Messages Recent Messages (16091 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense