New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13268 previous messages)

rshow55 - 07:39pm Aug 8, 2003 EST (# 13269 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

A first hand account would be good. I'd be interested in it, too.

Gisterme, I can't speak for almarst , but he might be jealous of you because you have such a beautiful, interesting, brilliant companion.

12988 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1139211@.f28e622/14664

12989 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1139211@.f28e622/14665

12990-12993 might interest some, too.

Fredmoore , your http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1139211@.f28e622/14948 left me thinking - and I'll sleep on my response. But yes, I think some fairly easy changes could make things better.

fredmoore - 10:04pm Aug 8, 2003 EST (# 13270 of 17697)

Human lasers?

This is interesting:

'Flash mob' stirs London August 9, 2003

A 10-minute outbreak of confusion and lunacy brought shoppers in the heart of London's biggest retail district to a standstill on Thursday night.

A crowd of more than 200, many of whom had met just 13 minutes before at nearby pubs, marched to a furniture store selling sofas just off Tottenham Court Road with strict instructions: call a friend on your mobile phone and praise the merchandise, but leave out the "0".

The event, organised by a 40-year-old Londoner, was Britain's first "flash mob" - an internet-inspired gathering of strangers who assemble to perform pointless acts.

Similar outbreaks of zany crowd behaviour have hit streets in various cities around the world in recent months as the phenomenon, which started in New York, crossed the United States to Japan and Europe.

Europe's first "flash mob" hit Rome last month when a group thronged at a bookshop and peppered staff with queries about non-existent books.

Last week, a few dozen people marched onto a busy Berlin street whipped out their mobile phones shouting "Yes, yes" in unison, stopping passersby in their tracks.

"My first reaction was I thought there was a fight. Then I thought it was a celebrity," shop manager Derrick Robinson said afterwards, mopping the perspiration from his brow while keeping an eye nervously locked on the store's entrance.

Reuters

  • *****

    This 40 year old Londoner may or may not realise that what he is doing is Cyber-pumping small human populations. Human lasers? The coherence generated by such events WILL have interesting consequences, either positive or negative. I hope this dude knows what he is doing! Coherent sources as we all know can be very powerful.

    It is also interesting to note that any laser needs a pump, a population to raise to a high energy state, a stimulated emission (thoughts culminating in action is good) and a mirror to amplify the process. The 'mirror' here is the media reporting on the events. To quench the process all you have to do is stop reporting on it!]

    Mind you in the future, for human civilisations to achieve their fullest potential the 'human laser' may be a useful tool if used wisely. The concept may have historical precedence. I am sure that the Ancient Egyptians were not unaware of its applicability in achieving large goals at least in an intrinsic sense.

    gisterme - 11:22pm Aug 8, 2003 EST (# 13271 of 17697)

    "...Gisterme, I can't speak for almarst , but he might be jealous of you because you have such a beautiful, interesting, brilliant companion..."

    Huh???

    I lost my wife a year and a half ago. How would either you or almarst know if I have another companion now?

    Wow. I think you're over the waterfall, Robert.

    More Messages Recent Messages (4426 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense