New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13089 previous messages)

fredmoore - 08:48am Jul 22, 2003 EST (# 13090 of 17697)

Gisterme,

Bravo Hercule!

PS

Give Condi our warmest regards and our best wishes for the 2020 'running'.

jorian319 - 09:22am Jul 22, 2003 EST (# 13091 of 17697)
day length increases 1 second every 500 days. -James "Idiot" Nienhuis

Gisterme,

What Fred said. Bravo.

I'm now convinced that Gisterme is indeed GWB. The evidence - he repeatedly mis-spelled "helicopter".

rshow55 - 10:41am Jul 22, 2003 EST (# 13092 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Gisterme , whatever else you may say about him, is an accomplished debater - deflecting what he can't deny - and "fencing" so as to avoid getting anything to closure.

13070 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1141800@.f28e622/14749

13071 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1141800@.f28e622/14750

13072 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1141800@.f28e622/14751 which ends:

Working on this thread, especially since February of this year, I have been making an assumption that people on the UN Security Council looked here from time to time. Those people know whether or not I was right or wrong.

I've also assumed that I was not alone in thinking that gisterme is Bush - for reasons expressed in 10063 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1141800@.f28e622/11608 .

"What did he know, and when did he know it?" is an interesting question.

The questions:

What did gisterme think and say, and when?

and

Is gisterme President Bush?

are coupled, and answerable, questions.

- - - -

They remain answerable questions - answerable by actually checking - after gisterme's last 16 (mostly evasive) postings.

To paraphrase Shakespeare, "I think he protests too loudly." http://www.handlebars.org/?a=article&articleid=174

More Messages Recent Messages (4605 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense