New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12294 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:26pm Jun 3, 2003 EST (# 12295 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

bbbuck - 01:40pm Jun 2, 2003 EST (# 12283 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.RErUbPHeYTe.1138282@.f28e622/13931 is a professional piece of work. In response to my statement that I'd set out to talk to people - in ways I'm honor-bound to do - carefully submitting to prior-restraint censorship - as best I can arrange it so that no reasonably classified information would be revealed, the response is

http://check-this-you-mother/komodos-are-pretty.com

A reasonable interpretation of http://check-this-you-mother/komodos-are-pretty.com , which connects to nada, nothingness - is "we'll kill you if you do that."

A message artfully delivered. The NYT probably knows - and I do not - is bbbuck on the NYT payroll? We live in a complex world.

I'm working to do just exactly what I promised Casey I'd do - consistent with things we both promised D.D. Eisenhower we'd try to do.

- - - -

Sometimes you can't quite get what you want - but you can simulate enough of it to have much of the needed effect - or even all of it. For example, I may not be able to get verified prior restraint censorship. But I should be able to simulate it well enough so that it will be hard indeed to say that I'm violating reasonable or decent security laws.

Speaking of simulation - Eisenhower, and others who were interested in serious simulations - and economic planning - would be very impressed with how much simulation can do today.

The 'Matrix' Invented: A World of Special Effects by ERIC A. TAUB http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/business/media/03MATR.html

Tucked away among the buildings and monumental empty hangars, hundreds of scientists, engineers and graphic artists map out computer-generated battles

Because simulation works as well as it does, there are new technical possibilities for real - with simulation as a stage toward getting to the real thing. The AEA project could have used the simulation capabilities available today.

I could now.

almarst2002 - 10:49pm Jun 3, 2003 EST (# 12296 of 17697)

Anti-American sentiment is widespread and at an all-time high in the Muslim world, a global research project released yesterday said. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,969779,00.html

THEY STILL DON'T LIKE US????!!!!

almarst2002 - 10:59pm Jun 3, 2003 EST (# 12297 of 17697)

As Congress and the media realize they have been "had" with respect to political manipulation and fabrication of intelligence leading to the strategically unwise war on Iraq, and the failed transition to peace in both Afghanistan and Iraq (as well as the losing wars on terrorism, drugs, crime, and poverty), there is renewed discussion of the need for a *public* summit on intelligence reform. - http://www.oss.net/extra/news/?module_instance=1&id=1158

More Messages Recent Messages (5400 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Resource Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators  / Missile Defense