![[F]](1076_77_files/site.gif) New York Times on the Web Forums
 Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
 
  (1074 previous messages)
rshow55
- 12:20pm Apr 4, 2002 EST (#
1075 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Mazza , you know that a great deal of discussion
directly on missile defense happens on this thread. It exists
in a context.
MD872 rshow55
3/27/02 2:59pm ... MD877 rshow55
3/27/02 3:54pm
You could argue that I've been moving slowly since the time
of the following postings.
Challenge, questions, and invokation of the need for
force:
MD728 rshow55
3/20/02 7:58pm ... MD729 rshow55
3/20/02 8:32pm
MD730 rshow55
3/20/02 8:37pm
Counterchallenge:
MD764 gisterme
3/22/02 12:34pm
Comment and response:
MD780 manjumicha2001
3/23/02 1:28am ... MD783-784 rshow55
3/23/02 10:15am
MD84 rshow55
3/2/02 10:52am
Perhaps I have been moving slowly. One reason is that I've
felt that things have been moving toward a situation where a
lot of things could get solved. Another reason is that it is
essential to get situations set up where right answers are
possible -- rather than certain to be evaded.
A key reason to want technical answers to questions about
missile defense is that those answers would move toward larger
answers to questions the whole world needs, and is coming to
know it needs:
rshow55
- 12:21pm Apr 4, 2002 EST (#
1076 of 17697)
Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Mazza , as you know, this thread has been going on
since the middle of 2000, and I've been active on it since
September 25, 2000. A great deal has been accomplished on this
thread, I believe, and it sometimes helps to review the
headings that it has had, and some of the history.
MD757 rshow55
3/22/02 10:54am ... MD 14-15 rshow55
3/1/02 6:07pm
Some of my background, which you also know, was on this
thread before March 2, and is now set out on a Guardian thread
.. Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror
217-219 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/228
273-277 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?13@@.ee7a163/289
278-279 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/294
I believe that I'm doing, as nearly as it possibly can be
done, exactly what Bill Casey would want me to do now, for the
good of the United States of America, and for the safety and
decency of the world.
lchic
- 08:16pm Apr 4, 2002 EST (#
1077 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
PSI
lchic
- 08:25pm Apr 4, 2002 EST (#
1078 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
If anyone explored this link (above) -- one article seemed
to say that the USA had OKAYED the Israeli assault to continue
for at least 4 more days! Silence from Bush is taken as the OK
to kill and keep killing!
lchic
- 08:27pm Apr 4, 2002 EST (#
1079 of 17697)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to
be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Enough is enough - Bush
President tells Sharon to end West Bank occupation http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,679195,00.html
 (16618 following messages)
  
New York Times on the Web Forums
Resource
Area for Forum Hosts and Moderators Missile Defense
| 
