New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (9698 previous messages)

rshow55 - 10:19am Mar 9, 2003 EST (# 9699 of 9702) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

It would be easier to get (partly persuade, partly force) Iraq and N. Korea to reform if we were partly persuaded, partly forced, to do so ourselves. (Since our faults are relatively so small, in our own estimation - it should be easy for us. )

Procedures set out in http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/296 and many times on this thread could work out all the logic needed to do that effectively.

Gisterme's postings since my 9675 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.hkiiaSJI5Ju.847119@.f28e622/11216 have been argumentative in some ways - but have offered openings for dialog, as well. We're in enough of a mess that a lot needs to be sorted out - but a lot of people know it, and that's hopeful.

Just a thought about what a happy ending might be, if leaders (not mere posters such as you and I) actually chose to take a stand: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/283

lchic - 10:37am Mar 9, 2003 EST (# 9700 of 9702)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Secrets reawaken that feeling from childhood that the ways of the world were infinitely mysterious, unpredictable and densely packed, and that someday you might come to know and master them.

http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20001203mag-intro.html

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us