New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8907 previous messages)

lchic - 03:16am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8908 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Millions to march in hundreds of cities - a global protest begins

More than 10 million people are expected to take to the streets in 600 cities today as part of global demonstrations against a war in Iraq

http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,896126,00.html

lchic - 03:19am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8909 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" The US and Britain's drive to gain international backing for a war with Iraq was in deep trouble last night in the face of unexpectedly upbeat reports by United Nations weapons inspectors.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,896139,00.html

lchic - 03:20am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8910 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

For improvement in process

don't knock out the factory

improve the process!

lchic - 03:26am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8911 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

'The Poster' ... everyone's put this thread on their 'ignore' list now ... just kidding ...

[Don't know where that wretched fellow emanates from but one does so try to appease him]

lchic - 03:32am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8912 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

And on the 7th Federal Day 'he' rested

Having took the federal budget 'he' spit it in two ...

giving ...

work on Monday Tuesday Wednesday for the Military industrial death-complex ... along with almost $400 billion

with some work on Thursday Friday and Saturday using the other half of the federal budget ... towards those works and services that provide Transport logisitcs, health, aged care, education, legislation, means-tested allowances, .... and the other 1001 things that people really need

Hey if Monday Tuesday Wednesday were moved over to things people really need (not death) ... then folks really could be better provided for ...

COMMON PROVISION

life isn't a 'race' it's a journey!

lchic - 03:53am Feb 15, 2003 EST (# 8913 of 8916)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Shibbedy-dab-dab-wallalllalllallallalla-dibby-doob-dab-la-la-la-la-deeben-daaben-deeben-

[BANG]

    A Ms Cleo Laine prediction

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us