New York Times on the Web Forums Science

Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.

rshow55 - 09:08am Feb 13, 2003 EST (# 8871 of 8871)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Given the current situation - I wonder how the United States, and other nations, might state their cases clearly by the standards of good stories. http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/ducksoup/555/storyshape.html

With statements clear enough that there would be enough shared space for understanding. http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP1/TP1-17.HTML

We're dealing with fundamental issues here.

Could the US state its arguments - at a level that could be set out so that everyone could understand its position (for example, with Disney characters) and look good - rather than look like a bully? http://www.whom.co.uk/squelch/world_disney.htm

Could other nations state their arguments to similar clarity?

For stability, a time is going to have to come where the key tactic of psychological warfare - immobilization by lies - is going to have to be set aside - at some levels - enough so that workable accomodations can be made.

That tactic has been fundamental to US policy since the early 1950's, at the latest - and we need to bring it under more control.

To get some things that need to be sorted out actually dealt with, there will have to be fights - about ideas, at least. If we're "merciless" enough about getting ideas straight - we won't have to be nearly so merciless with people - we won't have to be nearly so wasteful of human lives and hopes.

Enough consistency for reasonable stability is necessary - and that much consistency is worth fighting for. It seems to me that now is a good time for these fights - and that leaders of NATO nations ought to be proud to work toward getting clarity now.

8829 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.GdSwayWJ381.417243@.f28e622/10355

There's enough time.

New York Times on the Web Forums Science Missile Defense