New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8830 previous messages)

rshow55 - 03:12pm Feb 12, 2003 EST (# 8831 of 8833) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Here are articles connected to problems with "obvious" solutions that are now going badly:

The Other Korea http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/12/opinion/12WED2.html

It's hard to see how Washington can successfully manage the delicate nuclear weapons crisis with North Korea without close cooperation from South Korea.

News Analysis: Cracks in NATO Alliance By PATRICK E. TYLER http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/12/international/europe/12ALLI.html

EU Warns Iraq Rift May Disrupt Summit By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:23 p.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-EU-Iraq.html

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) -- EU leaders said the bitter divisions in NATO over Iraq could spill over into the European Union and warned on Wednesday of a ``deep crisis'' unless Europe finds a single voice on Iraq during a key summit next week.

``What is at stake is our determination to be heeded and to play a leading role on the world stage,'' said Prodi, who heads the EU's top executive body.

. . .

``It seems hard to believe that this disunity... can reach a lower point,'' said Liberal Democrat leader Graham Watson. ``That will only provide comfort for Saddam Hussein.''

Hans-Gert Poettering, leader of the assembly's largest group-- the conservative People's party agreed.

``The European Union and NATO are facing a disaster. Europe offers a sorry picture,'' he said.

_ _ _ _

And here is a brilliant and important suggestion - that could be very important if we want a difficult transition to occur - and occur with as much grace and legitimacy as possible.

Jordan Pressing U.S. to Offer Exile to Hussein By JOHN F. BURNS http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-EU-Iraq.html

AMMAN, Jordan, Feb. 11 — Officials at high levels of Jordan's government say they are pressing the United States to offer President Saddam Hussein and perhaps 50 of his top aides a guarantee of safe haven elsewhere in the Arab world if they will quit power in Iraq.

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us