New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8775 previous messages)

lchic - 05:00am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8776 of 8784)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Soyuz

Plans to send tourists into space have been frozen by Russia after the Columbia shuttle disaster left its Soyuz capsules as the only working link between Earth and the International Space Station.

Russia's Rosaviakosmos, the national aviation and space agency which sent two tourists into orbit to pad out its thinning budget, said its manned Soyuz rocket would not be wasted on commercial missions.

Unlike the U.S. shuttle, the Soyuz is not reusable and Russia says it has a limited supply of capsules. It takes two years to build a Soyuz.

http://abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s778272.htm

almarst2002 - 05:04am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8777 of 8784)

"The victims of Saddam Hussain should also 'when possible' claim against the tyrannical actions of that retrograde leader."

As well as remaining native populations victims of colonization, Turkish genocid against Armenians, victims of two WW and post WWII Cold War repressions, particularely Indo-China wars and China and Indonesia opression, Latin-american Dictatorship, military junta in Greece, problems of North Irland, Chechnia, Attrocities during Revolutions starting with French, Napoleon, and all the way back to the Egiptian empire.

But, if you want to be credible, you can't selectively apply the judgement against one dictator or case of abuse while ignoring the others, some even more serious.

lchic - 05:13am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8778 of 8784)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Smacking the-hip-pocket-nerve via class actions - is wanting tyrants to sit-up and take notice and bleed!

lchic - 05:14am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8779 of 8784)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

'A piece of PEACE?'

"Give us ten penneth!"

'Eat here? Or? Take away?'

© dR3

almarst2002 - 05:16am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8780 of 8784)

fredmoor - "thosands of Iraqis who ARE dying every year at the hands of a tyrant."

So, instead of lifting all but strictly military side of embargo and allowing the country to return to normal life, your solution seems to add thouthends more victims, future destroy the country, possibly ignite the internal ethnic conflict and re-colonise the Arab oil-rich nation at a peak of the growing world-wide crisis. And, if this plan does not work, we just say sorry and go back home accross Atlantic, in disgust of such a backward World.

lchic - 05:39am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8781 of 8784)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

BALI BOMBINGS - new info

http://abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/transcripts/s780910.htm

http://abc.net.au/4corners/

almarst2002 - 05:52am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8782 of 8784)

Lawyers' group set to condemn enemy combatant policy Group also challenges government's increased spying power - http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/10/aba.enemy.combatants.ap/

Its better late then never.

lchic - 08:46am Feb 10, 2003 EST (# 8783 of 8784)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Trouping through Europe - USA - dumps German bases

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/10/opinion/10SAFI.html

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us