New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8703 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:56am Feb 8, 2003 EST (# 8704 of 8705) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I posted on Psychwarfare, Casablanca -- and terror http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/407 and some other places this morning.

Posted this in Guardian Talk - Advice What's the best advice you've ever been given?

rshowalter - 12:31pm Feb 8, 2003 GMT (#478 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b23c/492

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b23c/490 - yes you WERE "head hunted" by a (fairly smart) person.

I'd been advised to do that sort of thing.

Here's what Casey told me - (others had said similar things - but not quite so clearly.)

    "In the world, the only decently able people who have real confidence are the people who really know their stuff - and really love it - and intend to advance the subject matter they have become committed to.
    "If YOU are a person like that (Casey thought I was) and you can actually MAKE A CONNECTION to another - it is a connection that will serve mutual needs.
Casey felt that the best way for me to identify first rate people was to talk to them - and find the ones who could, and would, really be honest - really be clear - really state simple things simply - and really care for progress.

I've been blessed to have known a number of such people - usually people widely understood by many others to be outstanding. Steve Kline was like that - and he dropped everything he had to - to work with me - because we were working on problems that he felt, and I felt - were the most important that we could possibly work on.

I've been awed, touched, and joyful at the brilliance and grace I've seen, and been able to touch, in Lunarchick . I have had some problems - but I've had an outstanding education - and a lot of very good academic and professional connections.

Dawn Riley is the most valuable mind that I've ever had the priviledge of getting close to - and as valuable a mind as I can imagine existing in the human species. She's analytically brilliant - and has the associative gifts, the poetic gifts, the communicative gifts developed to a stunning degree.

I adore her - and I'm grateful for the time she's devoted to our work, and to talking to me.

My hope is (and this was Casey's hope, too) that we can save many, many millions of lives, and make the world better. I'm crazy enough to think we have a chance of doing it - - and have made some headway.

MD8500 <a href="/webin/WebX?14@93.2VzdaBSf2us.0@.f28e622/10026">rshow55 2/2/03 6:38pm</a> cites a poem of mine that sets out some hopes that Lunarchick and I are both working for


More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us