New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8673 previous messages)

rshow55 - 04:07pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8674 of 8681) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Almarst : http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@93.IRS4aAOf2jE.1371258@.f28e622/10197 - - is very serious.

The Bush administration thinks it will be able to end its war in less than a week - or that is what it says. They don't talk of significant casualties to Americans - or consequences anything like those on the scale of http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2691475.stm so far as I know.

I can't judge the probability that they can win very quickly and at a low cost in life at all well.

Consequences on the scale of http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2691475.stm are terribly serious.

almarst2002 - 04:13pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8675 of 8681)

RE: Consequences - I am sure the US media will do the "good job". No one will notice.

rshow55 - 04:18pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8676 of 8681) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Russia Reiterates Doubts on War Against Iraq By MICHAEL WINES http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/07/international/middleeast/07cnd-russia.html

lchic - 04:30pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8677 of 8681)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Is Rumby this Crumby?

""Diplomats say that Germany, stung by Mr Rumsfeld's angry jibe that it is no different to "rogue states" such as Cuba and Libya, has let it be known that it will not budge on the US request before February 15, when Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, next reports to the security council.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,891331,00.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/

Iraq - Special Report

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/0,2759,423009,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us