New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8660 previous messages)

lchic - 03:01pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8661 of 8668)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Kurdish WOMEN in the early Nineties LOST their HUSBANDS BROTHERS SONS

killed on order of Saddam

On tangible statistical 'fact' of genocide on Iraqi people he should be 'removed' ....

this people can understand

whereas looking for the negatives of biological-chemical warfare doesn't add-up to a positive in the global popular mindset

almarst2002 - 03:04pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8662 of 8668)

"The Bush administration, for all its faults - is looking for solutions to problems that are real"

The problems created in a first place by whom?

Solutions to whoes benefit and at what cost and to be payed by whom?

One thing is clear - if there is a war and occupation of Iraq - the pandora box of solving the international problems this way will be open to all having the power to do so. Today its US. Tomorrow?

almarst2002 - 03:07pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8663 of 8668)

lchic,

If you care, I predict even more Kurds to be killed as result of this war. And not by Saddam. Rather by Turkey and US.

lchic - 03:09pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8664 of 8668)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Rice plagiarism Iraq ....

"Iraq’s declaration," adds Ms. Rice, "even resorted to unabashed plagiarism, with lengthy passages of United Nations reports copied word-for-word, or edited to remove any criticism of Iraq, and presented as original text."

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=5835

Rice plagiarism Westminster ....

    watch this space
    Forever!?

almarst2002 - 03:21pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8665 of 8668)

Excerpts From Iraqi Document on Meeting with U.S. Envoy - http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/glaspie.html

almarst2002 - 03:23pm Feb 7, 2003 EST (# 8666 of 8668)

A Meeting Between Saddam and U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie - http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/saddam_glaspie.html

Excerpts from an article by David Figrut titled: Operation Desert Storm: Outright Disinformation Scheme

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us