New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(8598 previous messages)
almarst2002
- 03:58pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8599 of 8638)
Nuclear arms labs would get more work under Bush budget
- http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/5101064.htm
almarst2002
- 04:10pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8600 of 8638)
While teams of U.N. experts scouring Iraq have yet to find
any hidden caches of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons,
some U.S. journalists seem to have already turned up their own
smoking guns. Whether out of excess zeal or simple
carelessness, the media's intensive coverage of the U.N.
inspections has repeatedly glided from reporting the
allegation that Iraq is hiding banned weapons materials to
repeating it as a statement of fact. - http://www.fair.org/press-releases/iraq-weapons.html
almarst2002
- 04:15pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8601 of 8638)
As social spending in the US plummets, the poor and
hungry are feeling the pinch. And a war against Iraq will only
add to their problems, writes - http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,889123,00.html
almarst2002
- 04:31pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8602 of 8638)
Powell’s Fairy Tales: Puerile and Patronising Colin
Powell’s “evidence” was ambiguous in the extreme, wholly
unconvincing, even suspicious, and the manner in which he
presented it was a blueprint of sheer arrogance The “evidence”
which was presented to the United Nations Security Council
today by Colin Powell was a miscellany of obscure recordings
which were misinterpreted by the US Secretary of State and
risible satellite photographs which bore a strange resemblance
to those which had been taken in Afghanistan two years before.
- http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/02/05/43044.html
almarst2002
- 04:33pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8603 of 8638)
The Australian Senate passed a non-confidence motion
against the Prime Minister John Howard today in connection
with the deployment of Australian troops against Iraq. The
opposition accuses Mr. Howard of sending Australian soldiers
to war without consulting the nation, the Parliament and
without a sanction from the United Nations - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/02/05/43015.html
chnm_info
- 05:44pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8604 of 8638)
Help historians tell the story of weapons of mass
destruction. Visit http://chnm.gmu.edu/tools/surveys/form/55
Weapons of mass destruction have become an increasingly
prominent issue in recent months, discussed and debated within
the United States and around the world. This is not the first
time they have been a concern, however. More than one
generation of Americans lived through the nuclear age of the
arms race with the Soviet Union, an era that stretched from
the 1950s to the 1990s. If you lived through this period,
please record your recollections and reflections with ECHO:
Exploring and Collecting History Online
(http://echo.gmu.edu/), a project of the Center for History
and New Media at George Mason University.
Thank you for your help in preserving the history of
weapons of mass destruction.
almarst2002
- 08:09pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8605 of 8638)
In comments rarely heard from a sitting U.S. poet
laureate, Billy Collins has publicly declared his opposition
to war - http://www.ohio.com/mld/ohio/entertainment/5112907.htm
A poet vs. OIL. Your choice?
almarst2002
- 08:14pm Feb 5, 2003 EST (#
8606 of 8638)
The Case Weakens, the Plot Thickens - http://www.antiwar.com/bock/bockcol.html
(32 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|