New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8566 previous messages)

lchic - 11:53am Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8567 of 8576)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Security Council

http://www.un.org/Overview/Organs/sc.html

Under the Charter, all Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council.

While other organs of the United Nations make recommendations to Governments, the Council alone has the power to take decisions which Member States are obligated under the Charter to carry out.

lchic - 12:03pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8568 of 8576)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

SAf > mission > Iraq

""The South African government, which chairs the Non-Aligned Movement and the new African Union, is concerned about the negative impact war might have on developing countries, especially a fear that their sovereign boundaries will no longer be respected.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,888400,00.html

lchic - 12:11pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8569 of 8576)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Checking Fact

Texas -- Briton due to die today seeks DNA test

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,888389,00.html

chnm_info - 03:23pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8570 of 8576)

Help historians tell the story of weapons of mass destruction. Visit http://chnm.gmu.edu/tools/surveys/form/55

Weapons of mass destruction have become an increasingly prominent issue in recent months, discussed and debated within the United States and around the world. This is not the first time they have been a concern, however. More than one generation of Americans lived through the nuclear age of the arms race with the Soviet Union, an era that stretched from the 1950s to the 1990s. If you lived through this period, please record your recollections and reflections with ECHO: Exploring and Collecting History Online (http://echo.gmu.edu/), a project of the Center for History and New Media at George Mason University.

Thank you for your help in preserving the history of weapons of mass destruction.

almarst2002 - 09:11pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8571 of 8576)

Richard Perle - France 'no longer ally' - http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030204-031831-1626r

How long will it take before Washington insist on "regime change" in Paris?;)

almarst2002 - 10:06pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8572 of 8576)

Kosovo: Chaos - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/02/03/42943.html

Horrendous abuses of human rights by Albanians Albanian gangs are causing havoc in Kosovo to such an extent that the UNO has called for the protection of the minority Serb population to be stepped up

mazza9 - 10:29pm Feb 4, 2003 EST (# 8573 of 8576)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Wanderer085us is incompetant, incapable of rational thought, obsessed with pushing his radical agenda above all else.

He and his minions lie about and distort issues daily. This 2-bit @sshole, who should be defenestrated!

And he can't even spell incompetent!!!

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us