New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8500 previous messages)

rshow55 - 06:48pm Feb 2, 2003 EST (# 8501 of 8536) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@167.abnJaYcKQY8^4031938@.f28e622/4270

2764 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@167.abnJaYcKQY8^4031938@.f28e622/3445

Scott Turow would be an ideal lawyer to solve some problems for me - in ways that might serve the public interest. http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@93.P1r0aocp0Ie^675418@.f28e622/9267

My guess is that he'd be a hard man to fool.

Rick Bragg would be hard to fool, too. 4581 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@93.cihBa3JK2TS.555141@.f28e622/5785

lchic - 09:44pm Feb 2, 2003 EST (# 8502 of 8536)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

OIL PRICE

"" 'A war could drive crude oil prices up by an additional $10-$15, or 30 to 50 per cent [to $46],' says Goldman's report

http://www.observer.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,886866,00.html

a rapid drop in prices as soon as US air strikes on Iraq began in 1991. But Goldman points out that there is less excess production capacity now, and that the market is overconfident in the capacity of strategic reserves to bring oil prices down. Use of strategic reserves may dampen near-term prices but will 'prolong price pressures', says the report.

Low global oil stocks and reduced exports from strike-torn Venezuela have boosted prices by more than 30 per cent since late November. ""

see || GU Business special: the economics of war

02.02.2003: War 'would mean biggest oil shock ever' 02.02.2003: What happens when markets go to war? 02.02.2003: Economy: The high price of toppling Saddam 02.02.2003: Savers: Don't panic - take cover 02.02.2003: Forecasters: Recovery 'could take two decades' 02.02.2003: Vincent Cable: The economic consequences of war

More Messages Recent Messages (34 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us