New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8315 previous messages)

rshow55 - 12:32pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8316 of 8326) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Here's a posting I'm proud of, that I think the NYT, and the Bush administration, and lunarchick ought to be proud of, too. Hope it works.

MD1999 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@167.abnJaYcKQY8^4029844@.f28e622/2484

bbbuck - 12:40pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8317 of 8326)

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/26/education/26THRE.html

The internet is real. At least it is for this sad 17 year old honor kid and his parents.

Unbelievable. Don't they know about the library?

lchic - 04:07pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8318 of 8326)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Johnson - now you're 17 !!

lchic - 04:13pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8319 of 8326)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Showalter i liked this from the link you commended above :

    new understanding is within reach, and major problems can be solved that could produce permanent improvements in the human condition.
    Solutions that would make our survival more likely.
    We need to do better about complex problem solving than we have done. We can.

lchic - 04:55pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8320 of 8326)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Chicago

http://www.chicago.worldweb.com/Maps/mapviewer.html

Ugh! Ugh! ugh ... busy NYT line!

~~~~~~~~

Which cleptomaniac ran off with 'search'?

~~~~~~~~

11:20am Jan 29, 2003 - by whoever under the Cooper label said this (a), my comment (b):

""

  • 1a) wager my entire personal fortune
  • 1b) raises the point - it the guy 'had' a fortune he wouldn't wager it - so he doesn't
    • 2a) Do you really think that the President's national security adviser or the president himself would actually be taking time away from the important work they do to trade posts with a lowly ex-grad student from Madison, WI?
    • 2b) Checking the width breadth and depth of the Showalter Postings ... here again i'd say 'Cooper nee _______ ' is quite jealous.
    • 3a) give me assurance that you won't make public my private phone number
    • 3b) 'Cooper' everyone's 'got your number!'
    • 4a) you're not saving the lives of a thousand people a day. Not even Superman kept that busy
    • 4b) Superman was a case worker for individuals - and now individually himself ... but ... now wanting advancements and the concept of increased research with the results becoming more widely available via 'common provision'.
    • 'Cooper' completely misses this point - that a change in 'thinking' across the globe wrt how to problem solve carefully and thoughtfully in times of Chaos -- results in improved outcomes for 'millions' - rather than they be ravaged by the excesses of 'war'.
    • 5a) But, sorry, pal, you're basically a nobody, just like the rest of us. The high and might aren't listening
    • 5b) Cooper says of himself - he's a nobody.
    • Saying that the politicians of the republican right are so removed from the 'people' that they are incapable of listening to their 'needs'
    • Says the US isn't an egalitarian society - rather rank and status based to the exclusion of the 'voice' of the people
    • Says that even when novel ideas are put forward that might lead to new approaches related to glaring unsolved problems --- the Admin-Politicians are so far behind the eightball that they don't have their desks cleared to attend to 'exception handling' .....
    ~~~~~~~

    - I checked out the 'subscription' thing ... I'm just an occasional poster checking the thread in 'my time' ..... I recall Johnson under some moniker or other on another board - playing his 'power game' - advising all NYT posters to put me on their 'off' list --- which pleased me, as i assume they did ...

    lchic - 06:43pm Jan 29, 2003 EST (# 8321 of 8326)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    NOT for war

    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993324

    More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
     Email to Sysop  Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





  • Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


    Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us