New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8227 previous messages)

lchic - 10:53am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8228 of 8235)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" The United States is now, as it has been for two centuries, both a city on a hill and a swamp at the base of the hill.

"" commitment -- fear of

    Leading academics and immigration lawyers want to drop the requirement that new citizens renounce allegiance to foreign nations and pledge allegiance to the United States
http://www.worldmag.com/world/

lchic - 10:58am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8229 of 8235)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

IRAN - WOMEN - FOOTBALL

    24 year ban on women attending 'stadiums' is being listed ... the language and behaviour of man was said to have been the reason for the ban ... Clubs have to 'suitably protect women' who will attend (bbc)
"It is fine if there are just 'a few' women .. but if there are a lot the men will come to watch the women - not the game" (Iranian male)

IRAN << WOMEN >> MORE DOLLARS to FOOTBALL Economy!

lchic - 11:06am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8230 of 8235)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

1441 "" ... Blix did not ask the security council for more time for inspections, which – much to the annoyance of Washington – leading council members such as France and Germany have strongly advocated.

In his 60-day update, as required under UN resolution 1441, Dr Blix said: "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance – not even today – of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace."

While conceding that Iraq had co-operated by allowing UN weapons inspectors access to all sites, Dr Blix noted: "I'm bound, however, to register some problems."

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,5905586%5E2703,00.html

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/cartoon/

Bush - it is said - will 'prepare' the US public over the next week for 'war with Iraq' ...

'prepare' being the re-positioning of the US public-mind ...

wrcooper - 11:52am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8231 of 8235)

In re: http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@93.zUBLaP6J17Y.0@.f28e622/9745 [rwhow55]

I don't care if you bring your wife, your shrink, ten bodyguards, and an attack poodle. Bring anyone and any recording device you like. That's fine.

But I am not going to go to Madison. You're the one who's so hot on checking. So you take the time and expense to come to Chicago. If you're serious about checking, thaat's precisely what you should do. You're asking the accused to go the extra mile, instead of you, the accuser.

Yes, I think you're paranoid and delusional. For good reason. Go back and read the nutty posts you've written, accusing people here of being high government officials and claiming that your maundering ruminations are saving the lives of a thousand people a day. Only a grandiose, paranoid, delusional individual would entertain such lunacy. Sorry, I think you're bright and probably could offer the world quite a bit if you ever got your thoughts under better control.

Come on down to Chicago. Email me at wcooper@21stcentury.net .

Bring whomever.

rshow55 - 11:59am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8232 of 8235) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

<a href="/webin/WebX?14@93.zUBLaP6J17Y.0@.f28e622/9757">wrcooper 1/28/03 11:52am</a> - - I'm glad to see that links are restored!

rshow55 - 12:00pm Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8233 of 8235) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

But in my case, not restored. How did you do get that link to post, Cooper?

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us