New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8217 previous messages)

wrcooper - 08:49am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8218 of 8225)

I've posted a number of times in this forum on the subject of missile defense. I've expressed my views on that subject, made them known. The reason that I'm ofering this challenge to Bob Showalter is that he keeps dragging my name into the forum, claiming I'm another man. He also keeps insisting on the value of checking, which I'm all for, too, as a supporter of the scientific method. So now I'm offering Bob a chance to check his facts, put his money where his mouth is. Let him contact me by email at wcooper@21stcentury.net and I'll arrange to meet him in Chicago, which is a manageable distance from Madison by car, where I will buy him a drink of his choice and show him my driver's license. He can compare the picture of me to a picture of George Johnson and will discover that I am not George Johnson. That should do it, shouldn't it? Right, Bob?

rshow55 - 09:32am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8219 of 8225) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Cooper (or "Cooper" ) - - I'm thinking about it seriously. You, of course, have my phone number.

If I go to Chicago, I'd like to bring my wife along. Not perhaps to share all our talk, but to meet you, take a picture perhaps, ask some questions, and see for herself. Nice museums and things in Chicago.

Even better, you could come up to Madison. Madison is less crowded than Chicago, and less expensive in some ways. You could come to our condo. We'd feed you well, and it could be a comfortable time. A lot of things can be checked about me in the Madison area. We could review some of the things you've posted about me on this thread - for instance - as I've read them, attribution of fraud and insanity have been built into some of your postings, especially a number now deleted - but on this thread for a long time. If I've misread them - perhaps you could explain to me how I have. I suspect we could arrange a meeting with my shrink while you visit Madison. It might be an intersting talk. Perhaps we could record it.

I'd like to meet with you - under circumstances that can be documented well enough to settle some questions - but I would like it well organized enough to settle some things.

If I owe you an apology on any point - you'll get one. I might expect some explanations from you, as well. I'm responsible for what I say and do -and its consequences - and expect other people to be, as well. Surely we agree on that?

lchic - 09:55am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8220 of 8225)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Ah! Ah! Ah! ... but how would anyone know that the person who'd represent themselves as 'Cooper' would be 'the same' person who posts as 'Cooper' ... especially when the one who posts as 'Cooper' is Johnston!

lchic - 10:00am Jan 28, 2003 EST (# 8221 of 8225)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

BUSH | Now here's a guy who has | A Credibility Problem By PAUL KRUGMAN

" The State of the Union address could restore the president's political fortunes, if he isn't held accountable for promises made last year. "

"" ..... the public is particularly disenchanted with Mr. Bush's economic policy. Most voters no longer believe that his tax cuts are effective at creating jobs, and many also believe that his policies favor the wealthy and large corporations, rather than people like themselves" http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/28/opinion/28KRUG.html

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us