New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (8185 previous messages)

rshow55 - 10:40am Jan 27, 2003 EST (# 8186 of 8192) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I've been working on this thread since September 25, 2000 rshow55 4/21/02 2:11pm where I had an all-day meeting on the web with an authoritative figure.

A recounting of what this Missile Defense thread has done since then is set out in Psychwar, Casablance - - and terror from #151 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/159 on. Links before March 1, 2002 are no longer on the web, but are available on CD. Discussion of this thread continues from #265 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/281

If you want a sense of how good this thread is -- sample lchic's work ! - - - . You'll find a wealth of thoughtful, wide-ranging citations. I think she's the most valuable mind I've ever encountered. Search lchic on other NYT threads and on the Guardian Talk threads, too. You'll be impressed. Lchic and I are partners on this thread - and she is much the better half.

I think we're both proud of the accomplishments described and put in context in MD1999 rshow55 5/4/02 9:39am

That work involved great contributions from "stand-ins" who have taken the role of senior Russian and American officials - - a role that has continued since March 1, 2000 #207 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/218

. . .

Some time ago, I made a guess that lunarchick and I are cutting the risk of death from war in the world - in an actuarial sense, by something like 1000 lives/hour we work. That's still my guess. I think some things are going interestingly, and well.

If anyone who reports for the New York Times, who will give me a valid name, and reason to believe that name - can talk to me, or to my wife, on any subject whatever concerning this thread. I think I have behaved as well, within the human limits, as anyone can reasonably expect, and feel that lchic has also. I've been proud and honored to work with lchic - though we have never had a conversation face to face - though we have worked together for almost three years now.

I think that professionals, interested in international negotiation, and particularly the problems with Iraq and N. Korea, might be interested in reading the postings that have gone onto this thread in the last few days. I'm proud of mine, and lchic's and think that many of the others are interesting, as well.

lchic - 07:11pm Jan 26, 2003 EST (# 8146 cites the story of the Emperor's New Clothes

http://www.vagabondpages.com/september02/butterfly.html

That is an important story about repression in social, institutional, and psychological senses that bear thinking about now. Some of the most "obvious" things are both "seen" and "denied"- and switching off the command to repress can make problems impossible to solve before soluble.

The Islamic world and Christendom have been hating each other - and actively repressing things about each other - at all sorts of levels -for more than a thousand years. We need to open our eyes.

Checking some key facts on this thread would be useful - because it would permit people to say "here, look for yourself" and sweep some dangerous repression away - sweep some dangerous misunderstandings away.

That could save tens or hundreds or thousands of thousand of lives (millions of lives) and improve the safety and comfort of billions of people. It seems to me to be worth doing - and I'm honored to have a chance to post here - awkward as it sometimes is.

wrcooper - 01:15pm Jan 27, 2003 EST (# 8187 of 8192)

Quote of the Day:

Some time ago, I made a guess that lunarchick and I are cutting the risk of death from war in the world - in an actuarial sense, by something like 1000 lives/hour we work.

Oy vay!

It must be nice to believe in oneself this much, to think one is doing so much good in the world. Too bad it's all gradiose delusion. I wish it were true...and it were that easy to save a 1000 lives a day. In 7 days, Bob and Ichic could save an entire 9/11's worth of victims. In a year, they'd rescue getting on to half a million. That's excellent work!

Well, keep it up, Bob and Ichic. Your paranoia and vainglory may be doing previous little more than eating up a portion of bandwidth on a couple of chat rooms, but even if you managed to save a single life, somehow, somewhere, I guess your voluminous maunderings would be worth it.

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us