New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7935 previous messages)

lchic - 02:14am Jan 23, 2003 EST (# 7936 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

unabashed plagiarism

IS Iraq a member of the UN

if so

Can't it use those docs

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/opinion/23RICE.html

gisterme - 02:43am Jan 23, 2003 EST (# 7937 of 7941)

rshow55 - 09:50pm Jan 21, 2003 EST (# 7887...)

"...I think some things in 7632-7635 were fairly clear about oscillatory solutions..."

Only that you apparently don't know what you're talking about. Give and take in discourse is not your invention, Robert. I has nothing to do with oscillation or periodictiy. Get over it.

"... - but if you're in a hurry for an answer - perhaps that means you need one you can use...'

I'm not in any kind of a hurry and I know you'll never give an answer that makes any sense. Therefore you could never offer an "oscillatory solution" that would be of use to me. How could you offer any solution to whatever problems I might have if you don't even know who I am or even if I have any problems? Do you have a general solution to all problems? I'd be interested to know what it is if you think so. :-) I doubt it though since you can't, by your own admission, even seem to solve your own problems, oh master of oscillatory solutions.

"... - one that can be discussed by the people involved...."

You and I are the only people involved, Robert. I'm trying to discuss this with you because I don't have anything better to do. Sad isn't it? Nobody else is stupid enough to even ask you what you mean. Why do I?

This is not a question and answer kind of thing. It's a question and evasion kind of thing.

I ask a question and you evade. You may not think what you do is evasion. You may just think it's "going slow" or "too complex to define" or some other silly excuse...but I think it's really just that you don't want to admit you don't know what you're talking about.

You just sort of bluster and spin your wheels.

I suppose I get some sort of twisted entertainment value from watching such an inflated ego as yours be so powerless to justify itself. You often seem like a spider that keeps getting caught in its own web...or perhaps you're the Wiley Coyote of web forums. Something like that.

That's why I do this.

lchic - 06:31am Jan 23, 2003 EST (# 7938 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Gist-Stern

    Stern-Gist
Some sort of Staunch
    Some sort of Trist
Showalter's 'human'!
    Is that something you Missed?

lchic - 07:04am Jan 23, 2003 EST (# 7939 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Saddam "was born in Iraq and would continue leading his country until the 'end' of his life" said Iraqi official.

The CRACKS are SHOWING in the EUROPEAN ALLIANCE ...... France/Germany ... and at the UN ...

CHINA - not for an American led attack!

China is worried and uneasy --- position close to that of France .... more time required to find weapons of mass destruction.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Turkey Iran Syria --- will loose cash (to smuggling) if an Iraqi war ....

(bbc news world service NewsHour)

lchic - 07:57am Jan 23, 2003 EST (# 7940 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The tone of Gisterme's missive above suggests he's one of these characters ... but which one ?

http://www.casalinx.com/index.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~

Psych~~~Warfare

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=psychological

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=warfare

"Casablanca summed up the morality of its time better, I think, than any || http://www.symbolism.org/writing/books/spc/symbols-creation/home.html

http://www.casalinx.com/index.htm

http://www.filmsite.org/casa.html

http://www.starpulse.com/Movies/Casablanca/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Does the morality of Saddam 'fit' Casablanca ?

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us