New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7928 previous messages)

lchic - 10:40pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7929 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

A Prolonged Winter's Sojourn With a Time-Traveling Cat

This editorial looks at the timeless-use-of-time in video-box land where the player's plateaux are hard gained in terms of time and opportunity cost --- How might the player better spend that 'once only' real time?

War is a similar game --- diverse players are plateaued --- they waste real time, once only time, they posture, position, gesticulate and the worse scenario they actually 'go to war' and kill real people in real time --- neither time nor people can be restored.

Just as KLINKENBORG sees the need to prioratise the use of leisure, so too do diplomats need to look to prioratise the use of peoples to avoid destruction and waste.

The WAR_GAME needs replacing by The PEACE_GAME ... what constructive approaches to a problem may be applied to give WIN_WIN best outcomes for all players ?

almarst2002 - 10:45pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7930 of 7941)

Why to compromise "WIN_WIN" if the winner takes ALL?

lchic - 11:05pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7931 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Only the Swedes would know the answer to that :

http://www.yimpan.com/Songsite/Lyric/index.asp?sid=5442

lchic - 11:11pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7932 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

In the same way that Napoleon (Chapter 5 Animal Farm / Orwell) ended the Sunday Democratic Meeting, so too in this present time, the Leaders of the USA and Countries alligned to it are closing their ears to the demands of their people that 'going to war' be a subject on the agenda and for discussion.

That the UN took over some responsiblities in Iraq has meant that the Christmas-Down-Time of Parliaments is now over ... and the people will want their say!

~~~~~~

    Napoleon, with the dogs following him, now mounted on to the raised portion of the floor where Major had previously stood to deliver his speech. He announced that from now on the Sunday-morning Meetings would come to an end. They were unnecessary, he said, and wasted time. In future all questions relating to the working of the farm would be settled by a special committee of pigs, presided over by himself. These would meet in private and afterwards communicate their decisions to the others. The animals would still assemble on Sunday mornings to salute the flag,

lchic - 11:13pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7933 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

http://www.mondopolitico.com/library/animalfarm/c5.htm

lchic - 11:17pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7934 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Business can take-over other entities smoothly or aggressively --- the latter method is seen to be a waste of time, money, effort and energy --- businesses can be so complex that at takeover it is logical to have all the workers at all levels informed, involved and on-side!

Wars have been to some extent attemps to 'take-over' either a Nation or the resources of the same. Most often a Win_Win deal can be negotiated where the workers in their 'virtual imaginations' belief their interests have been taken into account and their future needs are to be met.

lchic - 11:19pm Jan 22, 2003 EST (# 7935 of 7941)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Prescott BUSH - The STORY - THE PLAY - THE FILM

Obviously material for a cultural artistic-block-buster ... so why hasn't it happened?

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Post Message
 Email to Sysop  Your Preferences  Logout

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us