New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7781 previous messages)

lchic - 09:27am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7782 of 7790)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Iraq Questions - unanswered

Rarely has such an international crisis been conducted with so many questions unanswered:

  • does Iraq really still have weapons of mass destruction? The US and the UK say yes but have provided no public proof. The latest report is that the weapons inspectors have found eleven chemical warheads though they were not filled. The exact significance of these remains to be determined.The inspectors have also found some illegal imports of machinery connected to rocket development.

  • Which way will the Bush administration jump? There still appear to be tensions between hawks and doves, with the hawks arguing that the inspections will get nowhere and that war is the only answer, and the doves saying that more time should certainly be allowed and UN authority should possibly be sought.

  • Will there be a second Security Council resolution? Resolution 1441 simply speaks about a further discussion if Iraq is found to be in breach. The US and UK want to keep their options for unilateral action open. And if there is no breach, there will be no second resolution.

  • Who would declare Iraq to be in breach? The US has in fact already accused Iraq of so being, for allegedly not being truthful in its weapons declaration. The US promised Britain that this was not enough to be a cause for war but Washington reserves the right to make its own assessment and will not give the Security Council the only say.

  • Would Britain join the US if the Washington decided to act alone? Mr Blair is trying to calm his government and party by saying that he "strongly favours" a second resolution. But he is not bound by that.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2665495.stm

    lchic - 09:56am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7783 of 7790)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    USA weight gain - explanation

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2665793.stm

    lchic - 10:04am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7784 of 7790)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    NK | You cannot make the children, the ill people, the old people victims of a political crisis with which they have had nothing to do," he said. | http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2671191.stm

    lchic - 10:12am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7785 of 7790)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Australia - Canberra - Bush Fire - 10 dead

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003/01/item20030118005458_1.htm

    There are now also reports of homes being loooted.

    lchic - 10:25am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7786 of 7790)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Upholding HUMAN RIGHTS is the key to American success in their foreign policy ----

      bbc - How can democratic governments best fight an enemy like al-Qaeda? What should the limits of interrogation be if you have reason to believe the prisoner knows information that could prevent an act of terror?
      You can put your questions to the Kenneth Roth, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch in a LIVE interactive forum, at 1500GMT Monday 20 January.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/forum/2669919.stm

    commondata - 11:21am Jan 18, 2003 EST (# 7787 of 7790)

    lchic, What should the limits of interrogation be if you have reason to believe the prisoner knows information that could prevent an act of terror?

    How can you know that a prisoner has information that could prevent an act of terror? How can you judge the accuracy of your presumptions? How many innocent people would it be reasonable to torture to save how many lives? Who decides? Of what value is the information obtained in that way?

    Showalter has advocated torture and must have good answers to these questions. Is he saying?

    More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





  • Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


    Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us