New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7744 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:34pm Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7745 of 7755) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I'd point out that Turow clearly believes in guilt - and also mercy and extenuation - and his personal calibration is plainly different from that of lunarchick on issues like the death penalty. Turow feels that sometimes you need harsh punishment - or so I'd judge from what he writes. I do, too.

Mercy - and even the toleration of much injustice from some clear points of view - may be necessary, too - sometimes.

I believe that, and think that Turow feels that way, as well.

Pardon me for moving slowly. I'm scared, and tailoring the things I say with that in mind - as anybody would.

You can judge what Turow really cares about, in large measure - by judging how he spends his time - and how he charges for it. That applies to a lot of people - and though it is only one test -- it is a good one. It applies to me. I care about negotiation stability patterns. Know something about them. That doesn't necessarily make me a strange guy. Though I might have some unusual things in my background. Doesn't everybody?

I care a lot about money - and talk about it on the board from time to time - but it is subordinated in the sequences I've pursued so far. When you check - my main concern is setting out stability conditions that work. Though one can argue that I have no credentials that give me a right to say anything about them.

We're close, I believe, to much better solutions than we've had - especially if we ask, again and again "what happens to the children" -- and answer in ways that make sense to clergymen who actually have well balanced, comfortable flocks - and women who actually make shift to raise reasonably comfortable, reasonably successful children at least some of the time.

Pardon me for moving slowly, and picking my angles. I appreciate the chance I've been given, by people who do not trust me, to post on this board.

lchic - 02:49pm Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7746 of 7755)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Angles have degrees

Angels make decrees

______

Big Brother is watching you - Orwell 1984

Big Sister ... my way - a meat pie ... Your way an audio-off button

______

Clarity - Iraq - shimmers in the mirage

Comedy - Iraq http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/s765381.htm

_______

almarst2002 - 03:07pm Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7747 of 7755)

Thomas Friedman and ... plenty of olives - http://www.fair.org/extra/0301/ftaa.html

"Writing about the 2001 FTAA protests in Quebec, New York Times columnist and globalization guru Thomas Friedman dubbed globalization protesters "The Coalition to Keep Poor People Poor," and claimed that these "protectionist unions and anarchists" were hopelessly out of touch with the public of developing countries (New York Times, 4/24/01).

Had the U.S. media paid attention to the demonstrations at the October FTAA summit, they would have seen this assumption turned on its head."

lchic - 03:19pm Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7748 of 7755)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Scott TUROW (bio)

A Chicago native ... honorary doctors of humane letters from Loyola. Turow, an attorney, former U.S. District Attorney in Chicago and author of several best-selling novels, is receiving an honorary doctor of humane letters in recognition of his contribution as a fiction writer and novelist. His works include Presumed Innocent, The Burden of Proof, Pleading Guilty, The Laws of Our Fathers and Personal Injuries.

Born in Chicago, he graduated with honors from Amherst College in 1970, and received an Edith Mirrielees Fellowship to the Stanford University Creative Writing Center. He taught creative writing there from 1972 until 1975, and then entered Harvard Law School where he graduated with honors in 1978.

As assistant U.S. attorney in Chicago from 1978 until 1986, Turow was the lead prosecutor in several high profile federal trials investigating corruption in the Illinois judiciary. He is well-known for his pro bono legal efforts in which he won a reversal in the murder conviction of a man who had spent 11 years in prison for a crime to which another man had confessed. Today, Turow is a partner in the Chicago office of Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal. He sits on Gov. George Ryan’s Commission on Capital Punishment, is a member of the Illinois State Police Merit Board, and has served on the U.S. Senate Nominations Commission for the Northern District of Illinois.

More Messages Recent Messages (7 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us