New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7737 previous messages)

lchic - 08:57am Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7738 of 7743)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" The White House announced last night that Mr Blair would hold summit talks with Mr Bush at the President's Camp David retreat on 31 January, four days after Hans Blix, the chief UN weapons inspector, gives his initial report to the UN. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, will meet Colin Powell, the American Secretary of State, for talks a week from today.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=369678

lchic - 09:28am Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7739 of 7743)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

FISK

http://www.independent.co.uk/search/search.jsp?page=1&keywords=Robert%20Fisk&datemode=all&condition=1

lchic - 09:42am Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7740 of 7743)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" Everyone admires American science, technology and popular culture.

http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1511812

http://www.bbcamerica.com/genre/news/news_feeds.jsp

rshow55 - 10:37am Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7741 of 7743) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I have an apology to make. Night before last - watching a movie - my wife cut off the ringer on our phone - so I could call out - but nobody could call in . The mistake (if it was one - my wife has wanted to control my distractions lately, and hers) wasn't caught until last night - after I found that lunarchick had tried to return a call of mine.

I'm available - but I haven't read some recent parts of the board - because I'm wondering if, after all this much pressure - I might actually have a way to phrase a condensed message - that I have thought about a long time - from my relative isolation.

If my wife answers, and I'm exercising or otherwise engaged - I promise to return calls if she tells me about them.

A comment I made about George Johnson last night was, I believe - both balanced and just - though it had some difficulties. If only I could explain how much can be done with oscillatory solutions - when there is no stable justice possible that isn't prohibitively expensive, one way of another.

This was a key problem Nash was explicitly assigned - - and later - I was, too. For the life of me, every way I look at it - it seems to me that I've solved it. If people understood, the hopes expressed in Stevie Wonder's Someday at Christmas would be soluble, pretty well, step by step.

Pardon me for moving slowly.

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us