New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7737 previous messages)
lchic
- 08:57am Jan 17, 2003 EST (#
7738 of 7743) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
"" The White House announced last night that Mr Blair would
hold summit talks with Mr Bush at the President's Camp David
retreat on 31 January, four days after Hans Blix, the chief UN
weapons inspector, gives his initial report to the UN. Jack
Straw, the Foreign Secretary, will meet Colin Powell, the
American Secretary of State, for talks a week from today.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=369678
lchic
- 09:28am Jan 17, 2003 EST (#
7739 of 7743) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
FISK
http://www.independent.co.uk/search/search.jsp?page=1&keywords=Robert%20Fisk&datemode=all&condition=1
lchic
- 09:42am Jan 17, 2003 EST (#
7740 of 7743) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
"" Everyone admires American science, technology and
popular culture.
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=1511812
http://www.bbcamerica.com/genre/news/news_feeds.jsp
rshow55
- 10:37am Jan 17, 2003 EST (#
7741 of 7743)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I have an apology to make. Night before last - watching a
movie - my wife cut off the ringer on our phone - so I could
call out - but nobody could call in . The mistake (if it was
one - my wife has wanted to control my distractions lately,
and hers) wasn't caught until last night - after I found that
lunarchick had tried to return a call of mine.
I'm available - but I haven't read some recent parts of the
board - because I'm wondering if, after all this much pressure
- I might actually have a way to phrase a condensed message -
that I have thought about a long time - from my relative
isolation.
If my wife answers, and I'm exercising or otherwise engaged
- I promise to return calls if she tells me about them.
A comment I made about George Johnson last night was, I
believe - both balanced and just - though it had some
difficulties. If only I could explain how much can be
done with oscillatory solutions - when there is no stable
justice possible that isn't prohibitively expensive, one way
of another.
This was a key problem Nash was explicitly assigned - - and
later - I was, too. For the life of me, every way I look at it
- it seems to me that I've solved it. If people understood,
the hopes expressed in Stevie Wonder's Someday at
Christmas would be soluble, pretty well, step by step.
Pardon me for moving slowly.
(2 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|