New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7675 previous messages)

wanderer85us - 02:14pm Jan 15, 2003 EST (# 7676 of 7680)
Bush is stupid.

What about Iraq?

commondata - 02:14pm Jan 15, 2003 EST (# 7677 of 7680)

Shhhh, I love an rshow parable!

rshow55 - 02:16pm Jan 15, 2003 EST (# 7678 of 7680) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Sometimes, a stance can be rejected clearly at one time - and that exact same stance - after repetition - can be accepted in every way that matters - but in more calibrated form - at a later time.

rshow55 - 02:21pm Jan 15, 2003 EST (# 7679 of 7680) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

North Korea Calls Offer of U.S. Talks 'Deceptive Drama' By REUTERS Filed at 10:50 a.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/international/international-korea-north.html

Courships among the birds - and in other species, too - have some elements of "deceptive drama" built into them. They can be ugly or beautiful or both.

Stability and instability differ in key ways - but look alike in some others. For mating to work - everything has to be right. That's how it is supposed to work - for unchangeable mathematical reasons.

Diplomacy has some formal resemblences, and we'd be safer and richer if we knew them.

When weapons are involved - some issues are especially touchy.

rshow55 - 02:31pm Jan 15, 2003 EST (# 7680 of 7680) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The Iraqi situation is easier in some ways - but touchier in some others - though bird mating has some analogies there, too.

A key problem is that, for mating to occur (or peacemaking) - there are some key stabilities in the physical and social environment that are obligatory. Saddam and Bush have a technically awkward problem in that respect - and thank God neither one of them are virgins in any sense. If they were, it would be hopeless. As it is - if people move carefully - something workable, and fairly decent - is likely if people take their time.

I wish my big computer hadn't been knocked out. I had my heart set on a simulation of the Iraqi case - but haven't touched it. Sorry I'm moving slowly. I'm trying to be careful - but clear.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
See the
quick-edit help for more information.






Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us