New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7616 previous messages)

rshow55 - 04:36pm Jan 12, 2003 EST (# 7617 of 7620) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I was deeply in love, spacy, and young - trying my very best to court a woman I was in love is - and doing just exactly what she asked, every way I could - subject to the usual constraints for both of us. We were trying to work out a stable marriage, for us, where we were.

I had no way of knowing, at that time, that in difficult switching sequences - the only safe thing to do is to move slowly. Though I was trying to do that - it seemed to me - in ways that mattered. I blew it.

I know more now. I've worked hard. It is certain that we can make peace - so it works - take the incidence of death and ugliness from conflict way down - and do it stably.

We don't have to agree on a lot - including some basics. But we have to be careful.

We have time. We know enough. I'm hopeful - and doing the best I can.

When Marti told me that, to marry outside of her religion - the guy would have to hang a big rock on her - I listened hard. I listened to a lot of other things - and was knocking myself out to do her bidding - mostly - and she was reciprocating.

At one level we were "beathing the hell out of each other" - but in all the ways that mattered to me - I was hopeful . If we kept "fighting" - we'd have a stable marriage - or a stable professional relationship - both. I was hoping for everything - for her, for me, and for our children. We both wanted them - and were talking at a nuts and bolts level about how we'd go about raising them. She had to be damn sure I'd be willing to diaper them, and I assured her I would be grateful for the chance to do so. I was sure I had to have some income - and thought, probably wrongly - that from where I was - nobody could stop me from making enough for us to live on.

We have a lot of messes in the world that can be worked out safely and stably if we take our time. There are some aspects of canonicity - including some of a mathematical nature - that can shift the odds in our favor.

Language practices are big problems - and a lot of progress looks close at hand - given skills available, and interactions in existence now.

I made a request, on a postcard. Any kind of chaperoning anybody really needs would work for me - but it would be nice if the essentials of what I asked for then could be considered again.

lchic - 07:03pm Jan 12, 2003 EST (# 7618 of 7620)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Did the cold war flow over into The Domestic --- here's the biography, almost as Googled-up of :

Mr America

    " ... married, divorced, married again, lost my wife in an accident, remarried, divorced, and now live with my sweetheart in the State of ... Bliss? "
That's nuclear life!

lchic - 07:25pm Jan 12, 2003 EST (# 7619 of 7620)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=nuclear

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us