New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7607 previous messages)
rshow55
- 01:13pm Jan 12, 2003 EST (#
7608 of 7612)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
The Bush administration is wrong, I think, about a lot
involving sexual relations. Too draconian. But they are
emphatically right that sex relations in the US are in a mess
-and we need to do better - for ourselves - so we can live
with the rest of the world, and so the rest of the world can
live with us - step by step - comfortably, stably.
There are dangerous problems with the "canonicity" of
language - which is superb in some ways - but treacherous when
issues of quantity or balance have to be negotiated between
people who are too different. Some of these problems are now
terribly dangerous - and it seems to me that we can do a lot
better - and that language that can start being taught in
Sunday schools and kindergartens could make communication and
thought about quantity and mathematics more comfortable and
safer than it now is. It seems to me that a lot of progress
can be made - but that solutions have to work, for the real
people involved, every which way.
Extermination solutions are "clean and neat" in some ways -
but wrenching, and not acceptable. There are times when, I
believe, abortion ought be not only permissable - but even
obligatory. Some basic decisions have to be subject to
exception handling - so that they can be "honored in the
breach" in ways compatable at higher levels. Such things
happen at Harvard and Stanford all the time - but they are
done differently. There are many people who cannot, and ought
not, to go to either Stanford or Harvard - may of them with
excellences that could not exist at either Harvard or
Stanford. In America - we have to tolerate diversity.
Both Stanford and Harvard are merciless on their
graduate students in main line departments - and have to be.
They are merciless differently. They temper their severity
differently. There are formal correspondances between
University reproduction and animal reproduction.
rshow55
- 01:15pm Jan 12, 2003 EST (#
7609 of 7612)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
7232 rshow55
1/2/03 6:52pm includes this:
" Some issues of reproductive convention,
that go very deep, are sources of some of the strongest and
intractable problems and ill feelings.
" Should men proved to be not the
biological parent have to support a child regardless?
From Guardian Talk .. Nov 3-6, 2000 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/SupBast.htm
deals with an issue that the Islamic culture cares a great
deal about. Men all over the world care about this - in
America, perhaps more than they admit, or will talk about.
" Islamic nations have a lot of trouble
accomodating patterns of modernity - and a lot of those
problems connect to some deeply embedded committments to
assure paternity. I happen to think that abortion,
regrettable as it may be, is often the lesser evil in
America, and has to be permitted. But it seems to me more
clear that, when assuring paternity is an absolutely
uncompromisable value, as it certainly seems to be in
Islamic nations, genetic testing and abortion may offer much
better solutions than some that Islamic people are committed
to now.
Both the Bush administration, and leaders in the Islamic
world, have interests that might be well served by more
genetic testing for tracing of inheritance than is now
customary. These leaders, if they think about it - would agree
in some areas - but use signficantly different tactics in
others.
I am personally sure that if I had a wife who was pregnant
with another man's wife - I'd want her to abort - so that I
could stay married to her. Whether I'd want to know about the
abortion or not is an important question that would depend a
lot on details. But I'm sure of this. In America - some things
have to be permitted - and the kinds of "solution" set out in
My Last Dutchess by Robert Browning rshowalter
"Science News Poetry" 2/14/01 1:24pm ought to be ruled
out. That means that abortion will sometimes have to be
tolerated.
7161 rshow55
12/31/02 2:05pm
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|