New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(7588 previous messages)
rshow55
- 09:48am Jan 11, 2003 EST (#
7589 of 7591)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
I'm facing certain temptations. Sometimes the temptation to
tell the truth - and tell it in a reasonably whole, and
balanced way - is strong - and yet has to be resisted. I had
nothing to be ashamed of (on balance) at any time in the
sequence immediately leading up to, during, or immediately
after my torture - and neither, so far as I can tell, did
anybody else, on balance, though there were the usual
infelicities - some the results of mistakes, some obligatory
under the circumstances. I think Americans should be proud, of
the hard work that led up to my torture - and the work done
during it - and much afterwards involved with the efforts we
were involved with. All the same, there are cautionary aspects
to the tale.
I'm thinking about explaining the story, in a balanced way,
from my point of view, on this board - but am hesitating. I
can do it a little later, if I choose.
I have the usual mix of reasons to hesitate. And some
specific ones. For one thing, I think a lot of things I've
hoped for are going WELL - in my own analysis - and in the
actions of others.
For another, I'm making a transition of certain things from
a digital dominant to an analog dominant mode - my wife is
helping me - and doing it beautifully - but yesterday I got so
messed up that I flunked an eye test - from lots of points of
view.
Professionals judge "perfect" according to criteria - and
there is definitely such a thing as too much and too precise
correction in a pair of reading glasses. Too much resolution
can be harsh and distracting - and glasses are prescribed to a
level where the person being tested can't reliably distinguish
between one image and another a few seconds later. But people
are different - and needs are different.
For me, I think I need a set of computer glasses that have
the best resolution possible when my eyes are relaxed. I'll be
going back and getting an eye test redone (and a set of lens
specifications in a manufacturing que changed) so that I can
correct for my own insensitivity on the last test. I'll ask
for the prescription that lets me read the finest letters the
opthamologist can get me able to read.
Corrections, both plus and minus - have to be right for
specific circumstances - and answers that are backwards for
one purpose may be fitting in another particular case.
To be very sensitive according to some criteria -
you have to be very insensitive to many other criteria.
Some few times, even backwards.
I woke up this morning feeling great - exhilerated,
sensitive - - and I'm being careful. It isn't a good day for
big or fast moves - it feels like a good day to relax, and
make careful ones. Keller's piece is wonderful. I think things
we've been talking about on the board are going well.
I'm hoping to get some more organized, ready to show and
teach, about canonicity - and beauty.
I don't know whether I'll be posting much more today. I
may.
rshow55
- 10:07am Jan 11, 2003 EST (#
7590 of 7591)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Spent some time this morning toying with a small idea. Not
big. But fun - thinking about a project that might permit
North Korea to learn and do many of the things it needs to do
- things that the rest of the world also hopes for.
I think North Korea should learn to manufacture and sell,
for a profit, the Memorex personal compact disk player, Model
# MD3020suffixB - - not hypothetically - but in such detail
that they could actually do it - and actually did do it. On a
profitable basis for THEIR society. With the sales real - not
handouts.
I had an ulterior motive. I was hoping to be involved, in
some way. Just dreaming - but small dreams, sometimes, can
help people to work things out - in contexts where they can
make small mistakes.
If North Korea - itself - could manufacture saleable
Memorex brand Personal Compact Disk Players (Model #
MD3020suffixB) so that it worked - and was a paying
proposition - after a short period of transition - they could
make a living for themselves - and we could live with them
comfortably.
It might also be possible to work out an industrial base -
unique to them - that would sustain the country well, and
comfortably - in harmony with their traditions. They
could design measurement and precision tool manufacturing
equipment - very specialized but general purpose testing
equipment - and organize teams to actually do the tests where
there is a market for the services. There should be such a
market - it should be stable and large - and the North Koreans
are well fit for it in a very essential way. They are
different from other people. Sometimes, that is
precious. It is an essential, when certain kinds of testing
need to be done.
(1 following message)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|