New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7576 previous messages)

lunarchick - 05:41pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7577 of 7588)

Iraq - DITHER/London - Editorial

There's a call from London that any move into Iraq be postponed to September. Were this to happen it would allow a 'dither' period for talk and negotiation.

Editorial:

There can be no wavering from the goal of disarming Iraq, but all chances of doing so peacefully should be explored before the world is asked to decide on war. Before that point is reached, Washington should share its evidence with the public.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/10/opinion/10FRI1.html

lunarchick - 05:47pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7578 of 7588)

DI-THER-PLOMACY

Showalter what would you think if the word DI-PLOMACY were changed to DI-THER-PLOMACY ... would it give more time to find the ugly-frayed edges and re-sort and adjust them back to beauty and smoother functionality.

lunarchick - 05:53pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7579 of 7588)

When ever people from different contries/cultures come together there's a WestSideStory aspect - fights

between gangs - 'Jets' and 'Sharks'

JETS

The Jets are gonna have their day
Tonight
The Jets are gonna have their way
Tonight
The Puerto Ricans grumble
'Fair fight'
But if they start a rumble
We'll rumble'em right

SHARKS

We're gonna hand'em a surprise Tonight
We're gonna cut'em down to size
Tonight

http://www.musiclinks.nl/songteksten/Westside_Story_Soundtrack/7108.html

lunarchick - 06:06pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7580 of 7588)

Movements of peoples ... migrations ... refugees ...

mean re-settlement into a 'new' and very 'different' culture

In the USA those migrants who may have come in as babes and known no other culture, who speak only American-English and are through and through, thoroughly AMERICAN .... are, if they commit a misdemeanor and haven't been put through the process of full-citizenship by their adoptedfamily/family ...

being DEPORTED

to the land of their birthplace

there - imprisoned for weeks or month in foul crowded cells until released into the community.

America offers no re-settlement grant.

~~~~~~~~~

America will have the highest ratio of 'social-adjustment' specialists per head of 1000 population in the world.

What went wrong?

Why did the social and political adjusters FAIL youth.

Cambodia has had over 1400 young American people pushed into it.

South America is having young Americans re-directed.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Is there no attempt by the USA to 'straighten the thinking of these 'children' out' within US society?

Why do 'gangs' become a phenomena?

What factors are at work?

How can a host Culture transform failure to success within it's own borders.

What 'damage' is USA failure doing to the countries that are receiving these 'well fed, well developed muscular people - in suits, who are culturally abhorations within their parent's and grandparents old culture - and may not even speak the language.

Is the US just 'copping-out'!

lunarchick - 06:15pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7581 of 7588)

Gisterme says he's at war ... I'm not sure with whom, but, wars have both orbital-debris and human-debris in the form of disoriented peoples who have to be accommodated elsewhere!

America (above) demonstrates that it - as a society can't manage to iron out the 'ugly - frayed' aspects of re-settlement.

If it's integration policy, and that's a country with the highest number of social specialists per 1000 head of population in the world, hasn't been sufficient to get people up and running and integrated .... then what chances have refugees - anywhere ?

lunarchick - 06:24pm Jan 10, 2003 EST (# 7582 of 7588)

Eurasian land mass

- baltic sea may freeze over (last did this in 1948)- 300 frozen dead collected from the streets/subways/homes of Moscow

- Afganistan - many dwellings unfit for wintering over in - mass movements of peoples into Pakistan

- Germany - FOUR MILLION UNEMPLOYED

~~~~~~~

It seems there's plenty of opportunity to put people to work to improve the quality and standards of life without unnecessarily flushing more people as refugees into overloaded systems.

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us