New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7392 previous messages)

almarst2002 - 10:31pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7393 of 7409)

Writer Gunter Grass said that George W. Bush is a threat to the world peace - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/01/05/41646.html

almarst2002 - 10:41pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7394 of 7409)

"The US kept it's part of that bargain"

You mean the light water reactors are already in place?

If I am not mistaken, to most people in this planet, particuarely to the most Koreans on both sides, its quite clear the US did all it can to PREVENT the steps which could lead to end of conflict between Koreas. Or to make the N.Korea a better place to live. The reactors where postponed so the N.Korea, just like S.Korea and Japan, will be totaly dependent on the ME OIL "guaranteed" by US in exchange for the "good behavier".

almarst2002 - 10:59pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7395 of 7409)

Bush’s high politics is saturated with lies - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/01/04/41610.html

almarst2002 - 11:17pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7396 of 7409)

The North has repeatedly said that it is willing to negotiate, and yesterday the government appeared to accept the outline of the South's plans.

"There is no reason why the US should not accept the proposal, the best way for a peaceful solution," it said in a statement on the state news agency. It is unclear, however, whether Mr Bush will swallow such a compromise. The US president has said he "loathes" the north's leader, Kim Jong-il, and is opposed to any plan that rewards Pyongyang's brinkmanship. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,869437,00.html

gisterme - 11:18pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7397 of 7409)

almarst2002 1/5/03 10:15pm

"...But what is the reason to call someone a name without explaining the reason?..."

Didn't know I did that almarst. What do you mean?

almarst2002 - 11:21pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7398 of 7409)

The United States is a country on the edge, lacking its customary self-confidence. And for that it can thank George Bush. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,869079,00.html

almarst2002 - 11:29pm Jan 5, 2003 EST (# 7399 of 7409)

gisterme 1/5/03 11:18pm

When Bush called N.Korea an "Axes of Evil" in a context of his promise to fight the American enemies preemptivly anywere anytime by any means including nukes - there could not be many different responses from N.Korea. Either capitulate or take up the arms. They calculated they can afford the later.

I heard the Koreans are a very proud nation. If you or some other Americans have an idea of what does it mean.

More Messages Recent Messages (10 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us