New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7118 previous messages)

lunarchick - 11:43am Dec 29, 2002 EST (# 7119 of 7125)

Trueman | buck stops here | exception handling

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BuckStopsHere

lunarchick - 12:03pm Dec 29, 2002 EST (# 7120 of 7125)

Trueman | " When the decision is up before you -- and on my desk I have a motto which says The Buck Stops Here' -- the decision has to be made." In his farewell address to the American people given in January 1953, President Truman referred to this concept very specifically in asserting that, "The President--whoever he is--has to decide. He can't pass the buck to anybody. No one else can do the deciding for him. That's his job .

lunarchick - 01:19pm Dec 29, 2002 EST (# 7121 of 7125)

Watching defrag re-organise the data on my hard drive just now .... cleaning-up the drive ... removing wasted space ... leaving it neat and tightly packed and efficient --- running smoothly

a reminder that most things fit neatly into a set place

'Exception handling' is working out what to do when a few things aren't sitting in place - neatly

Showalter when you speak of yourself dealing in 'Showalter Problems' ... then exactly this, you're searching for and finding solutions that are new and novel ... that iron out a problem, can be passed down ... leaving you ready to deal with the next

Presidents get well rewarded, and have limited tenure, working through exceptions ....

lunarchick - 01:21pm Dec 29, 2002 EST (# 7122 of 7125)

..... did the CIA send you 'that' letter yet? :)

rshow55 - 02:37pm Dec 29, 2002 EST (# 7123 of 7125) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The CIA didn't - but there are times when I think the CIA is right not to - if they want to serve the national interest. That's based on an assumption - that I'm writing, and being read here by people with influence - including at least indirectly the President of the United States - and can do what almost no one else in the government or the nation can do. Tell him, in detail, and none too gently, when I think he's wrong.

As a negotiating spot - it is a good perch - though there's a lot to be said against it in other ways.

Maybe I'm delusional - but it seems to me that the things Casey was hoping for me to do are getting done.

I'm scared and a bit overwhelmed now - been trying to review some things - but for the life of me, I'm hard put not to feel that a lot of things are going well - that the NYT has a lot to be proud of - that lunarchick is not only the most valuable mind I've ever encountered - but one of the most valuable minds anyone has ever encountered - - and that a lot could get better - maybe pretty soon. I thought the WEEK IN REVIEW today was awesomely good!

Are things dangerous? Sure are. But I'm having a hard time, just now, not being very hopeful. And grateful for the chance I've been given to squat here on the NYT MD thread, and write.

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us