New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Campaigns
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (7104 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:29pm Dec 28, 2002 EST (# 7105 of 7114) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

mazza9 12/28/02 5:52pm . . . How much different is the "price" on American lives, compared to the price on Russian lives, or French lives, or British lives, or Chinese lives, or Vietnamese lives, or Iraqi live, or Korean lives . . . or other lives?

From American perspective, very different. Rightly so.

But how different is the price of other lives from a Russsian, or French, or UK, or Chinese, or Vietnamese, or Iraqi, or Korean perspective. . . or a United Nations perspective?

How different should these prices be?

I thought mazza9 12/28/02 5:52pm was wrenchingly ugly - because it was both so cocksure - and so historically distorted. ( In WWI, the US played something similar to the role of the straw, in the "straw that broke the camel's back." -- and in WWII, the US had leadership - but a look at figures for death and wounded would give one pause.

There are problems in the situation in Iraq, but all the same, a great deal in international relations and international law was clarified - and put into context in the UN discussions that have happened about Iraq in the last four months -and discussions that are ongoing.

Much more can be accomplished if the North Korean situation is discussed as clearly.

lunarchick 12/28/02 6:16pm - - is right. What makes human sense now?

That question can be reasonably discussed, without any forgetting of the past. We need to remember the past - and not only the pretty parts.

THREATS TO USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS: The Sixteen Known Nuclear Crises of the Cold War, 1946-1985 by David R. Morgan http://scienceforpeace.sa.utoronto.ca/WorkingGroupsPage/NucWeaponsPage/Documents/ThreatsNucWea.html sets out a record that most Americans never knew about. Things that most Americans should know about.

Maybe, from the North Korean perspective, and from the perspective of many other people, the evil isn't all on one side.

MD7090 rshow55 12/27/02 8:43pm

7001-7002 rshow55 12/24/02 7:33pm

7091-93 rshow55 12/27/02 9:09pm

What about the golden rule ? http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/DetailNGR.htm

The North Korean mess is ugly - but it isn't going to blow up the whole world, as the conflict between Russian and the US easily could have (in large part because of agressive stances on the part of the US). Perhaps in resolving the Korean mess, with the Arab world looking on - and with the things said in the negotiations about Iraq remembered - we can take steps to see that the world is considerably safer.

An illustrated script of Casablanca http://www.edict.com.hk/movies/casablanca/casablanca1.htm

Casablanca is common ground, something culturally literate Americans know -- and that people the whole world over understand, at the level of sympathy, and intellectually, too. I used the movie as a point of departure in PSYCHWAR, CASABLANCA, AND TERROR , which tells a key story about the Cold War, interesting to American, Russians, and others. http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/0 Especially the core story part, from posting 13 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/12 to posting 23 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/22 There is a comment in #26 that I feel some may find interesting, as well...

These days, the United States often looks far too much like Germany, as depicted in Casablanca - - though of course they are differences. In Casablanca , Germans aren't depicted as racists - but they are arrogant, merciless bullies.

None of the goo

rshow55 - 08:34pm Dec 28, 2002 EST (# 7106 of 7114) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

None of the good things about the United States would change, if we changed the times when we act like arrogant, merciless bullies. There is good reason to discuss a good deal about the North Korean crisis at the U.N. - - and comments and posts by almarst since March 2001 would be well worth looking at - in addition to other arguments.

More Messages Recent Messages (8 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us